Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the <br />City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly called held at the City Hall on <br />Monday, the 8th day of December, 1997 at 6:30 P.M. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Goedeke, Maschka, Mastel, Wall, and Wiski, <br />and the following were absent: None <br /> <br />Council Member Mastel introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 9490 <br />RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE REVIEW PERIOD FOR <br />MENDOTA HOMES, INC. <br />REQUEST FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AT <br />COUNTY ROAD C2 AND HIGHWA Y 88 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Mendota Homes, Inc. has requested a concept development plan <br />approval for a planned unit development at the intersection of County Road C2 and <br />Highway 88 (PF2891); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on this <br />request on December 10,1997; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council has scheduled hearings on the City's 1998 <br />budget for Council meetings in December; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the request of Mendota Homes, Inc. will not be submitted to the City <br />Council for action until January 12, 1998. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City <br />of Roseville, Minnesota (the "City"), Ramsey County, Minnesota, that pursuant to <br />Minnesota Statutes 15.99, the time line for agency review of the application of Mendota <br />Homes, Inc. request for concept development plan approval for a planned unit <br />development at the intersection of County Road C2 and Highway 88, be extended for 60 <br />days, from January 9. 1998. to March 9. 1998. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by <br />Council member Maschka and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: <br />Goedeke, Maschka, Wiski, Mastel, Wall <br />and the following voted against the same: None <br /> <br />Resolution 9490 - Page 1 of 2 <br />