Laserfiche WebLink
I ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br /> 2 MINUTES OF MEETING OF JUNE 6, 2012 <br /> 3 ROSEVILLE HARRIET ALEXANDER NATURE CENTER—6:30PM <br /> 4 <br /> 5 PRESENT: Boehm, Diedrick, Etten, D. Holt, M. Holt, Ristow, Simbeck, Wall <br /> 6 ABSENT: Azer and Doneen contacted staff with excused absence <br /> 77 STAFF: Brokke <br /> 9 <br /> 10 1. INTRODUCTIONS/ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> II None <br /> 12 <br /> 13 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—MAY 1, 2012 MEETING <br /> 14 Minutes of the May 1, 2012 meeting were approved unanimously with one spelling correction. <br /> 15 Commissioner Wall pointed out that the name of consultant Ron Leaf was misspelled. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 3. DISCUSS JOINT CITY COUNCIL/COMMISSION MEETING <br /> 18 An e-mail from Commissioner Doneen outlining his thoughts on the agenda was distributed. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Chair Etten introduced the topic of the joint City Council/Parks and Recreation Commission <br /> 21 meeting with the expectation of 30-40 minutes to share recent achievements and upcoming areas of <br /> 22 interest. The draft memo prepared for the May meeting was refined and revisted. Topics were <br /> 23 discussed, confirmed and Commissioners were assigned the following areas to guide: <br /> 24 <br /> 25 I.Review of the Past Year <br /> 26 a. Master Plan Implementation (D. Holt) <br /> 27 b. Park Dedication (Simbeck) <br /> 28 c. EAB (Doneen) <br /> 29 <br /> 30 2. 2012 —2013 Topics of Discussion <br /> 31 a. Park and Recreation Renewal Program <br /> 32 1. Moving Forward (Etten) <br /> 33 2. Community Volunteers (M.Holt) <br /> 34 3. Pathway Plan in conjunction with Public Works (Diedrick) <br /> 35 4. Grants and partnerships (Wall) <br /> 36 b. Capital Improvement Program(Etten) <br /> 37 c. Park Improvement Program(Etten) <br /> 38 d. Park Board/Park District (Simbeck) <br /> 39 e. Local Option Sales Tax (Ristow) <br /> 40 <br /> 41 A primary goal of the meeting will be to discuss a future work plan and gather guidance and <br /> 42 direction from the City Council. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 4. PARK & RECREATION RENEWAL PROGRAM <br /> 45 Chair Etten reviewed the recent litigation developments. Specifically that on Wednesday, May 23, <br /> 46 2012 the Responsible Governance for Roseville's Petition for Review was filed. This means that <br /> 47 the City cannot enter into any commitments to spend the bond proceeds until the Supreme Court <br /> 48 considers whether or not to hear the case. It is anticipated that on June 19th or June 27th we will <br /> 49 know whether the case will be heard or not. At this point we are waiting, with no future meetings <br /> 50 or projects scheduled. <br /> 51 <br /> 52 Staff informed the Commission that work with ASU to prepare the lead consultant Request for <br /> 53 Proposal (RFP) is continuing in order to be ready to issue when appropriate. Caution is being taken <br /> 54 on how much to engage ASU now because of the limited amount of work to do at this time and the <br />