Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION � _ ��U ����� �� BEST VALUED CONTRACTOR`" ,°=_==_=° " "~="° ~=" <br /> 4.1 ANALYSIS OF PROPOSALS <br /> w <br /> All responsive Respondents will be evaluated based on the criteria outlined in <br /> Sections 1.3 and 3. The City may use a decision making tool to assist them in <br /> analyzing and prioritizing the Respondents based on the submitted information. All <br /> responsive proposals will be evaluated based on the criteria and weights outlined in <br /> Section 2.3. The City shall use a decision making tool to assist in analyzing and <br /> prioritizing the proposals based on the submitted information. <br /> w The City will determine the potential best-valued Respondent who, in the sole <br /> judgment of the Citv, beet meets the requirements of the project. The City reserves <br /> the right to clarify or seek additional information on any proposal. The City also <br /> reserves the right to re-scope the project, waive irregularities and informalities, <br /> and/or cancel and reject a|| propoea|e. <br /> w The City shall use a simple linear relationship model to assist in analyzing and <br /> prioritizing the proposals based on the submitted information. This model will assign <br /> the most points tothe Respondent with the beet score in each oriterion, and fewer <br /> points to the other Respondents (based on their relative distance from the beet). <br /> Seethe example below (this is only an . <br /> No Criteria Weight Firm A Firm B Firm C (Score) (Score) (Score) <br /> 1 Interview 350 5.5 7.0 9.5 203 258 350 <br /> 2 Cost Proposal 250 $10,000 $15,000 $12,500 250 167 200 <br /> 3 Risk Plan rating 150 3.5 3.0 8.5 62 53 150 <br /> 4 PC Plan rating 100 6.5 5.0 7.5 87 67 100 <br /> 5 VA Plan rating 100 7.2 7.0 9.0 80 78 100 <br /> Overall Score: 730 668 950 <br /> w <br /> In the "Score" column, Firm A receives ^25051 points for cost because they have the <br /> lowest cost. Firm B receives ^18751 points for cost ($10,000/$15,000*250 points). <br /> Firm C receives ^20051 points for cost because ($10,000/$12,500*250 points). The <br /> same procedure is repeated for all the oriteria/data. and then the Overall Score is <br /> calculated for each Firm. <br /> 4.2 IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL BEST VALUE <br /> w <br /> After prioritizing all of the Respondents, the City will identify the potential beet valued <br /> consultant in the following manner: <br /> 1) If the highest ranked consultant'e Total Cost is within budget and their cost is <br /> not more than 10% higher than the next highest ranked consultant's Total <br /> Coet, then they will be invited to the Clarification Phase. <br /> Page 25o[4O <br />