My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0716
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0716
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2012 12:59:07 PM
Creation date
8/17/2012 12:58:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/16/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting AND <br /> Board of Adjustments and Appeals <br /> Monday,July 16,2012 <br /> Page 31 <br /> As a general question, Member Willmus asked at what point in this process, the Twin Lakes <br /> Business Master Plan was officially adopted back into the current Comprehensive Plan as a <br /> controlling document. <br /> Mr. Grefenberg <br /> Mr. Grefenberg recalled those 2008 discussions about Target, and the Comprehensive Plan <br /> Steering Committee's recommendations that Target and Har Mar Mall both be designated <br /> "Community Business." In arguing that point, Mr. Grefenberg opined that it was his under- <br /> standing that Target would be grandfathered in, but any future expansion would be precluded. <br /> Mr. Grefenberg opined that he was not arguing that Target was a community business, but that <br /> future development would be prohibited. In the grand compromise, Mr. Grefenberg opined <br /> that it had been determined to leave the definition as is and accept it. However, Mr. Grefen- <br /> berg recalled Member Willmus asking him to stop pushing Target and as part of the compro- <br /> mise, any future development for big box retail on the Target site would be prohibited. Mr. <br /> Grefenberg stated that he was left with the impression that from now on the Target site and <br /> Rosedale were set aside for future big box, not prohibiting all big box, but separating those us- <br /> es within the Comprehensive Plan designation. Mr. Grefenberg opined that he had a different <br /> recollection that his argument was for limiting future big box expansion on the Target site. <br /> As far as a response about the Twin Lakes Business Master Plan adoption as a controlling doc- <br /> ument to the Comprehensive Plan, Mr. Grefenberg could provide no response. <br /> Member Willmus asked for staffs response to that question during their upcoming comments. <br /> Mayor Roe asked that City Manager Malinen pass down the additional bench handout from <br /> Mr. Grefenberg; and advised that whether or not it was included as part of the record would be <br /> determined by the Board later in this meeting. <br /> Public Comments <br /> Vivian Ramalingam,2182 Acorn Road <br /> Ms. Ramalingam shared several anecdotal comments regarding the proposed Wal-Mart use and <br /> apparent discrepancies between the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code; questioning per- <br /> spectives on size, what is or is not suitable for the site, and how to best resolve those discrep- <br /> ancies. <br /> Mary Alexander, 19 Mid Oaks Road <br /> Ms. Alexander questioned what was in this proposal for Roseville; whether there was a finan- <br /> cial or employment benefit; and how it would create advantages for the community's current, <br /> yet dwindling, family-owned independent businesses. Ms. Alexander expressed his endless <br /> frustration in the current traffic situation in traveling north on I-35W and her concerns with the <br /> impacts of this development on an already over-taxed system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.