My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0813
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2012 11:54:07 AM
Creation date
8/28/2012 11:54:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/13/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,August 13,2012 <br /> Page 20 <br /> The project team was unable to respond to that question without further re- <br /> search. <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted that in 2008, $3 million of taxpayer dollars had <br /> been spent to begin the Master Plan process for the City campus (e.g. utility <br /> building, public works, fire station, city hall, skating center) for them all to be <br /> included on the geothermal system. To-date, Councilmember McGehee noted <br /> that only the skating center had been brought into the system; and opined that <br /> since the system was too large to realize additional efficiencies and savings, <br /> connecting to other buildings would improve those efficiencies if properly done. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that, if the Fire Station was put on the system <br /> to further balance the load to achieve those efficiencies, it would seem that ex- <br /> pectations could be for improved efficiency of the original geothermal invest- <br /> ment. Councilmember McGehee expressed frustration that she was unable to <br /> obtain a clear answer to whether or not this was accurate. <br /> Further discussion included projected additional savings at the Skating Center if <br /> the system was expanded (estimated at $21,000 annually); potential added effi- <br /> ciencies gathered from the OVAL and potential reduction in the payback period <br /> as well; and recognizing that the return on investment would be broader through <br /> savings for other facilities beyond that of the Fire Station. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that, even though a piecemeal approach to <br /> make connections, the City Council should look at the original $3 million in- <br /> vestment and Master Plan to connect all buildings to avoid short-sightedly jeop- <br /> ardizing that $3 million investment. Councilmember McGehee further opined <br /> that the information provided to-date did not provide that detail to her satisfac- <br /> tion. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, the Project Team confirmed that the $8 million <br /> cost, without geothermal, did not include the debt service on the bonds. Mayor <br /> Roe observed that those costs were already outside the budget; but should be in- <br /> cluded in the litigation and bond cost category, not construction costs. <br /> • <br /> At the request of Councilmember Johnson, Chief O'Neill addressed the varia- <br /> bles from the original project to the delayed project and implications and addi- <br /> tional costs for the architectural and management teams and their retainers for <br /> their services, including rebidding portions of the work. <br /> Councilmember Pust expressed her concern with how the geothermal issue was <br /> presented, specifically the total project cost with and without geothermal and <br /> the additional funding needed if geothermal was considered. Councilmember <br /> Pust opined that it seemed short-sighted to not to include the geothermal por- <br /> tion; and further opined that the extra bond, litigation and project costs should <br /> be directly related to the events surrounding that bond process, not how the pro- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.