My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-08-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-08-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2012 9:33:34 AM
Creation date
8/29/2012 9:24:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/28/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
624 <br />avoid excessive, unplanned for costs; with Chair Vanderwall concurring that this <br />625 <br />would be based on community wants /needs and part of the context definition. <br />626 <br />After further discussion, consensu as that additional language was not <br />627 <br />Member Gjerdingen, for public clarity, suggested that the last sentence of the first <br />628 <br />paragraph of the policy (page 1) be better explained as discussed tonight <br />629 <br />addressing flexibility for incorporating Complete Street principles. <br />630 <br />policies with some of those revisions currently underway at the staff level. <br />631 <br />Chair Vanderwall opined that it was sufficiently clarified at the end of the Policy, <br />632 <br />where approval by the City Council and procedures were addressed, with <br />633 <br />exceptions specifically addressed and identified (page 5, last sentence). <br />634 <br />Member Gjerdingen noted Member Stenlund's comment (page 4) under water, <br />635 <br />and the need to modify the first four (4) pa ra raphs above that, specific to <br />636 <br />transporting water, not just people. <br />637 <br />638 <br />Member DeBenedet noted language provided storm water drainage as an element. <br />639 <br />640 <br />After further discussion, consensu as that additional language was not <br />641 <br />necessary, as the discussion was at a higher level related to surface transportation <br />642 <br />for safe, accessible and multi -model transportation networks without additional <br />643 <br />specificity needed since those infrastructure issues were dealt with under separate <br />644 <br />policies with some of those revisions currently underway at the staff level. <br />645 <br />Page 15 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.