Laserfiche WebLink
204 <br />Member Gj erdingen opined that it was not unreasonable to attempt this <br />205 <br />accomplishment over a ten (10) year period, comparing other proposed park <br />206 <br />improvements being considered. <br />207 <br />M' <br />208 <br />Chair Vanderwall cautioned that all of the Parks Implementation Program projects <br />209 <br />are good projects for the community, not just the pathway portion; and should not <br />210 <br />be viewed as competing for dollars or priority. Chair Vanderwall noted the need <br />211 <br />to work in partnership, and continue the great job of public involvement achieved <br />212 <br />by the Parks and Recreation Commission throughout the Master Plan process. <br />213 <br />Chair Vanderwall opined that the entire $19 million was absolutely worth it to the <br />214 <br />community, and would provide benefit back to the public overall. <br />215 <br />Page 5 of 16 <br />