Laserfiche WebLink
Member Stenlund opined that, even though there are rules to follow, there could <br /> be some situations where a variance was forced to be granted or move into a <br /> penalty fee; and further opined that there were always exceptions to the rules, and <br /> just because something wasn't supposed to happen, didn't mean it can't happen. <br /> Member DeBenedet strongly encouraged that staff include something to address <br /> downstream impacts in case of a new development. <br /> Ms. Bloom noted the need to include such language consistently for all three (3) <br /> utilities, which was not done at this time. <br /> Member DeBenedet suggested including language, similar to that in the storm <br /> water ordinance language requiring new development and/or redevelopment to <br /> reduce their rate of runoff <br /> Ms. Bloom noted that part of the City's comprehensive surface water <br /> management plan would include language specific to problem areas and their <br /> proportionate shares of the problem areas; with Mr. Schwartz providing examples <br /> past examples (e.g. Rainbow, Rosedale, and Har Mar Mall). <br /> In conclusion, Ms. Bloom noted, in the pathway area of the Assessment Policy, a <br /> new section addressed the new TMP component for assessing on a 25/75% split <br /> for neighborhood petitions for sidewalks that are not included in the Pathway <br /> Master Plan map. <br /> At the request of Member DeBenedet, Ms. Bloom concurred that a redevelopment <br /> clause needed to be incorporated into the Assessment Policy language to address <br /> those areas not included in the priority map and not a priority segment, but <br /> requested by a neighborhood and addressing zoning code requirements. <br /> Members concurred that, with the changes outlined during tonight's discussion, <br /> the Policy was close enough to complete that the PWEC didn't need to see <br /> another draft, and directed staff to proceed with presentation of the Policy to the <br /> City Council once final revisions were incorporated. <br /> Member Gjerdingen moved, Member DeBenedet seconded, formally <br /> recommending the revised Assessment Policy to the Roseville City Council, <br /> amended as per tonight's discussion to the format presented by staff(Attachment <br /> A); as amended <br /> Ayes: 5 <br /> Nays: 0 <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 7. Draft Complete Streets Policy <br /> Page 12 of 16 <br />