2012_0924_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: 9/24/2012 Item No.: 12.d Department Approval City Manager Approval Item Description: Accept Wal-Mart Security Agreement B ACKGROUND 1 2 At its July 9, 2012, regularly scheduled meeting the Roseville City Council approved the preliminary 3 nd plat of Twin Lakes 2 Addition with the following condition (among others): 4 5 CONDITION #12 (REVISED) 6 Amendment to the original motion by the addition of Condition #12 that: “Wal-Mart Real Estate 7 Business Trust shall agree to enter into a Development Agreement satisfactory to the City, which 8 includes a provision that for one (1) year, Wal-Mart will pay for any law enforcement costs associated 9 with services provided to their operations in excess of a base line of three hundred (300) calls per 10 annum; with a review of that data after one (1) year) for any potential adjustment. 11 At its July 23, 2012, regularly scheduled meeting the Roseville City Council approved the final plat and 12 nd development agreement of Twin Lakes 2 Addition with the following amendment to Attachment B of 13 the Development Agreement (line 180 of Subpart a.): 14 “…communicate with the Police Department. [, and which also includes a cost-sharing proposal 15 relevant to law enforcement costs associated with the development, which proposal is acceptable to 16 the City Council.]”; with the remainder of the language to remain ensuring that the City Council majority 17 determines if the Plan remains in place and is serving its intent. 18 Since the conditions have been added to the development agreement the Police Department has met 19 with Wal-Mart officials on several occasions. The attached “Security Plan for the Roseville Wal-Mart 20 Store”, Attachment A to this RCA explains the end result of the meetings. The security plan has been 21 reviewed by the City Attorney. 22 The off-duty officer presence required as part of the Security Plan will add to the level of public safety 23 at Wal-Mart and not deter Wal-Mart officials from calling the Police Department because of a fear of 24 monetary penalties. The off-duty officer will be in a position to process many crimes and other public 25 safety tasks that take place at Wal-Mart and not burden the on-duty officers. 26 Police staff feels the Security Plan, along with Wal-Mart’s current building and staffing practices related 27 to parking lot lighting and security, on–site asset protection, etc., allow for public safety concerns to be 28 met. 29 Page 1 of 2