2007_0723_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Couacil Study Session Monday, JuIy �6, 2007 Page 26 � Twin Lakes Business Park AUAR Update, process, scenarios, sum- 2 mary impacts and mitigation strategies, and next steps. Ms. Schlicting 3 focused on what was different from the first update. "Next Steps" 4 were identified by Ms. Schlicting as: 5 ➢ City Council deiermination that the AUAR update is complete and 6 accurate and authorizing thirty-day comment period (10-day by 7 statute); S ➢ AUAR update 30-day comment period; 9 ➢ Public Comment Meeting — August 20, 2007; 10 ➢ Response to objections, if filed; and 11 ➢ Adoption o� the Twin Lakes Business Park AUAR Update. 12 13 Mayor Klausing noted the time again, and ongoing discussion of this item only 14 past 11:00 p.m., was approved by consensus. 15. 16 Discuss�on included extended public comment time from 10 to 30 17 days; pro-rated cost allotmen� of mitigation stra�egies as identified per 18 City Policy for a condition to futu;re land use applications for financial �9 partic�paiion determined by their use, traffic generation, etc. 20 21 Councilmember Thlan questioned whether the draft update included 22 consideration of pollution contamination studies done in connection 23 with the previous developer and Eminent Domain proceedings. 24 25 Mr. Schlicting advised that the appendix referenced the studies; how- 26 ever, didn't considex ihem above and beyond typical requirements of 27 development application requirements and state and federal remedia- 28 tion laws. 29 30 Staff confirmed that they didn't have access to the documents, but that 31 th�y were held by a priva�e developer. 32 33 City Attorney Anderson clarified that the comment period for agen- 34 cies having regulatory authority ran from publication; and that general 35 public comment was not considered by the Environmental Quality 35 Soard (EQB}. 37 38 Councilmember Pust asked, and Ms. Schlicting clarified, that to- 39 night's document indicated cumulative changes.