CC_Minutes_2012_0626_School Bd - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Joint School Board No. 623/City Council Work Session Monday,June 26,2012 Page 6 School Board Member Edstrom advised that, in the recent past, there had been some prelimi- nary discussions with the City's Community Development staff on space at the Owasso site for intergenerational housing; with that housing component including shared service space on the first floor for the School District to provide outreach for students. However, Ms. Edstrom not- ed that those were only brainstorming ideas shared in the past and within that context. Ms. Edstrom stated that she would be interested in once again reviewing the results of that evalua- tion. Councilmember Pust stated that she would be remiss if she didn't mention the interest of the North Suburban Senior Council and some seniors in the community and area in that as a poten- tial site for a senior center. Chair Gogins noted that there were lots of ideas; however, viable options were needed to be developed by a group to determine the best 2-3 uses of the property. Since this is a taxpayer asset, not just a School District asset, Chair Gogins noted the need to make sure the community receives the best value possible from the site. Councilmember Willmus noted that the City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority efforts went beyond the "H" for "housing" to the "R" for redevelopment, and therefore, other avenues could and should be considered. Mayor Roe opined that it made sense to get the various stakeholders involved. Councilmember Pust opined that it was important to populate the discussion with fiscal ac- countability to educate the public and all stakeholders on what was actually possible beyond a wish list. Otherwise, Councilmember Pust noted the disappointment of the community when their ideas were sought, and then benched due to unavailable funding. School Board Member Langston opined that those making up any potential task force or group of decision-makers represent a broad perspective of the community and provide some balance in that representation. City Manager Malinen opined that it would be a priority of the City to try to preserve the ball fields along with any future use. Mayor Roe, as well as others at the table from the School Board and City Council concurred that ball fields be preserved, not necessarily in their same location, but at the same site if at all possible to ensure there was no net loss of ball fields. Councilmember Willmus noted that the Parks and Recreation Department served the same broader community as School District 623. Further discussion included the scope of a potential task force; realistic nature of the proposed timeframe, with consensus to expand that timeframe by another three (3) months to September of 2013, for completion before November of 2013.