My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-08-27_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-08-27_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2012 9:51:34 AM
Creation date
10/1/2012 9:51:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/27/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
would be unable to address all aspects of the project at this time without more <br /> information before her, but these items would certainly be part of the future <br /> Feasibility Report, Ms. Bloom offered her willingness to meet with the <br /> neighborhood even before the project informational meetings are scheduled and <br /> the proposed Feasibility Report is approved by the City Council. <br /> Member DeBenedet noted, as part of the decision-making processes, the <br /> community or Roseville continues to rate community-wide curbed streets as a <br /> high priority, thus the 25% assessment to benefitting properties. Member <br /> DeBenedet noted that the rest of the City picked up the remaining 75% of the <br /> costs; and that this Policy applied to all residential properties, whether they were <br /> actually benefitting from an improvement at that time or not. Member DeBenedet <br /> opined that the entire community benefited from well-maintained streets. <br /> At the request of Chair Vanderwall, Ms. Bloom confirmed that the Assessment <br /> Policy was based on a standard residential street, whether a road was an MSA <br /> road, such as Victoria Street, with everyone assessed on a thirty-two foot(32') <br /> width and 7-ton strength; artificially lowering the cost even when roads, such as <br /> Victoria Street, are constructed to a 10-ton standard. <br /> 3. Approval of July 24, 2012 Meeting Minutes <br /> Member Gjerdingen moved, Member DeBenedet seconded, approval of the July <br /> 24, 2012, meeting as amended. <br /> Corrections: <br /> • Page 3, Lines 117, 121, 124 (Gjerdingen) <br /> • Line 117: Correct to read "...option to build a bridge across Highway <br /> 36 in the vicinity of Snelling Avenue, but stymied..." <br /> • Line 121: Correct to read "...bridge across Highway 36, specifically in <br /> the area of Hershel Street, along the Snelling Avenue right-of-way, but <br /> taking into..." <br /> • Line 124: Correct to read "...further east, near the Rosedale Mall..." <br /> • Page 7, Lines 284, 294 (DeBenedet) <br /> o Line 285: Correct to read "...resurface County Road C from Long <br /> Lake Road..." <br /> o Line 294: Correct to read "...alignment of the NE Diagonal Pathway <br /> Ayes: 5 <br /> Nays: 0 <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 4. Communication Items <br /> City Engineer Debra Bloom advised that many projects were wrapping up for the <br /> 2012 construction season; and noted that updates on various construction projects <br /> were included in tonight's meeting packet or available on-line at the City's <br /> Page 3 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.