Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 17, 2012 <br /> Page 15 <br /> quarterly basis, since the HRA had found evidence of some benefits in similar edu- <br /> cational processes. Ms. Kelsey noted that there used to be a crime-free volunteer <br /> rental group, now defunct, and recommendations to reinstate that could be forth- <br /> coming. Ms. Kelsey noted that some communities require a background check on <br /> any tenants moving into a building, which could help safeguard areas the City cur- <br /> rently didn't have any ability to enforce. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon noted that the vast majority of multi-family properties in Roseville <br /> were run very well, but as usual only a few "rotten apples" spoil the bunch; and <br /> needed to have this occur. However, Mr. Trudgeon noted that it was not the intent <br /> to concern those property owners managing their properties well, or penalize those <br /> following regulations. Mr. Trudgeon reiterated that there were a lot of good multi- <br /> family property owners in Roseville, with only a few select problem properties to <br /> address. <br /> Councilmember Pust, with regard to third party inspections if that became a rec- <br /> ommendation, wanted to ensure that they do so in a fair and transparent process. <br /> Through use of a crime-free addendum, Councilmember Pust sought to balance the <br /> right tools to keep people safe while not making things more difficult. While a <br /> background check may not accomplish that, Councilmember Pust saw the use of a <br /> crime-free addendum accomplishing the goal. However, if someone made a mis- <br /> take in their past, Councilmember Pust advised that she could not support them be- <br /> ing disallowed to rent property in Roseville, or to have it used unintentionally, es- <br /> pecially when the community was attempting to recognize its diversity. <br /> Councilmember Pust further questioned if the City wanted to go so far as to require <br /> people to attend meetings with local government, but to rather incentivize their par- <br /> ticipation in the meetings rather than require attendance. As the program is de- <br /> signed, Councilmember Pust suggested a survey of other metropolitan communities <br /> that have a system in place where they don't use the Office of Administrative Hear- <br /> ings, but hire less expensive private people as s quicker, cheaper way to provide due <br /> process and accomplish the same goals (e.g. City of Brooklyn Park). <br /> Councilmember McGehee echoed the comments of Councilmember Pust regarding <br /> third party inspectors, that the process be transparent. Councilmember McGehee <br /> spoke in support of the targeted process, opining that resident or tenant complaints <br /> didn't always come forward for a variety of reasons, thus creating the need for an <br /> open process to encourage complaints from third parties (e.g. social workers) rather <br /> than forcing residents to make a complaint. With collection of information or inci- <br /> dents from emergency responders, and third parties, as well as residents themselves, <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that it should provide a reasonable threshold for <br /> what we could say is a targeted property. <br /> Councilmember McGehee further concurred with the idea of incentives for attend- <br /> ing educational meetings to inform property owners and/or tenants about City Code, <br />