My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0917
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2012 1:05:30 PM
Creation date
10/3/2012 1:05:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/17/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 17, 2012 <br /> Page 17 <br /> Mayor Roe publically acknowledged that that the report was excellent, and that the <br /> intern had done a fantastic job. In the report, Mayor Roe noted that there was a dis- <br /> cussion on what happens to tenants if a multi-family property license was revoked, <br /> and his concern that people don't lose their homes. While unaware of the answer, <br /> Mayor Roe questioned if there was a way under a license suspension or revocation <br /> for transition management by the City or an independent contractor for a process to <br /> keep tenants in their homes while remedies are taken, or at least to transition them <br /> without an abrupt change. Mayor Roe opined that a tenant shouldn't be penalized <br /> for something an owner does or doesn't do; and questioned if there was a way to in- <br /> spect and/or license on a unit basis rather than a building basis from the point of <br /> view that the building may only have a few bad units with the remainder of the <br /> building fine. Mayor Roe questioned if the landlord should be punished for the <br /> building or just the units;however,he recognized that it made it more difficult to do <br /> on a unit basis. <br /> From the rental study group experience in 2006, Mayor Roe noted the advantage in <br /> having landlords and tenants involved in the process of developing policy, as well <br /> as potentially having a local owner group serving as the rental licensing board to <br /> provide education incentives and one step in the disciplinary peer review process. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that having fellow property owners tell you to "get your act <br /> together" was one concept or idea to consider as opposed to government staff doing <br /> so. <br /> Mayor Roe noted another option could be "point of sale" or rental inspection as an <br /> option, and while supporting that, he cautioned that care was needed to avoid the <br /> costs for such a program being put on tenants, since many are already faced with af- <br /> fordability issues. Mayor Roe advised that it would be his intent to avoid having a <br /> building move to the affordable rent situation based on its poor condition. <br /> Councilmember Johnson, based on past experience as a renter, noted the premises <br /> inventory document signed before paying a rental deposit, basically serving as an <br /> inspection of the entire property for pre-existing conditions so you were not penal- <br /> ized when you left. Councilmember Johnson questioned the advantages of having <br /> rental properties do this to protect tenants and as a resource for consideration from <br /> which to build an investigation or inspection. Councilmember Johnson opined that <br /> this served as a good protection for occupants; and reiterated that there were only a <br /> handful of properties of concern. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Ms. Kelsey clarified that only one Ro- <br /> seville multi-family building was of less than five (5) units. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned if there was a need to tie those problem <br /> buildings needing immediate repair into the current abatement program. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.