CC_Minutes_2012_0917 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, September 17, 2012 Page 19 d. Continue Discussion on Whether to Amend City Code, Chapter 302, Regard- ing the Number of Allowable Off-Sale Liquor Licenses Mayor Roe introduced this topic, based on past City Council discussions over the years; and invited Finance Director Chris Miller to make a presentation. Mr. Miller summarized the discussion by the City Council to-date, as detailed in the RCA dated September 17, 2012. Mr. Miller noted that this had come up again most recently at the request of representatives of Cost Plus/World Market. Mr. Miller suggested that the conversations essentially provided three different options as out- lined in the staff report; and suggested that Councilmembers openly debate those various options. Mayor Roe noted the addition of three (3) bench handouts related to off-sale liquor licenses: one from June 14, 1984 to the Roseville City Council from Howard Dahlgren of Consulting Planners; a Work Session Agenda from June 18, 1984 on a proposed ordinance regarding off-sale liquor licenses; and a RCA dated July 9, 1984 for an ordinance regulating the number of licenses. At the request of Councilmember Pust regarding a lack of staff recommendation, Mr. Miller responded that, as stated in the past, he could find no compelling reason to limit the off-sale licenses to ten (10) or whether that was a good or bad decision, seeming to be a self-imposed amount. Mr. Miller opined that his level of indiffer- ence may stem from his personally at this point, further opining that from a societal or public safety impact, rationale just wasn't there for that number. Councilmember Willmus noted that the discussion initiated from trying to deter- mine where the notion of ten (10) licenses originated; but noted that this remained unknown since meeting minutes from the 1984 work session were not kept; but the staff memo clearly stated that they were not recommending restricting the number. However, from that meeting, it was apparent that this fairly hard restriction was put in place; and since the Roseville population was similar to that of today, he ques- tioned if there was any compelling reason to change it. Councilmember Willmus advised that his position remained as such; and questioned if the thought was to move toward eleven (11) licenses or beyond that even. Councilmember McGehee concurred with Councilmember Willmus in not seeing any compelling reason to change the number. When reviewing the map of off-sale locations, Councilmember McGehee opined that there appeared to be a fair distribu- tion; and when considering precedents and fairness in the decision-making, opined that the policy had in place for some time and people had built based on that policy, with the policy continuing to work well. Regarding the Cost Plus request, Coun- cilmember McGehee suggested that if they are interested in a liquor license, they can wait for one to become available; or suggested that they shouldn't have chosen to give theirs up in the first place. Regarding conversations about a potential Trader