My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0917
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2012 1:05:30 PM
Creation date
10/3/2012 1:05:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/17/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 17, 2012 <br /> Page 8 <br /> not proposing any funds for repair of the road, Ms. Bloom noted that the County <br /> was interested in turning over those roads to the City. <br /> Mr. Schwartz noted that it was ultimately the City Council's decision whether to <br /> accept the road or not. At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Schwartz <br /> reviewed legislative action, most recently in 1993, to turn back roads through nego- <br /> tiation, with some taking place immediately and others deferred. <br /> Ms. Bloom advised that there was currently some discussion at the State level re- <br /> garding another round of turnbacks, with the state turning back roads to the county, <br /> with the county turning them over to the City. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Pust, Mr. Schwartz confirmed that the purpose <br /> was to shift financial costs to local governments. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that he had attended a Map 21 meeting today, with discussion <br /> under a new federal program for turn backs; and basically shifting costs to local <br /> government. <br /> By consensus, Councilmembers commended the PWETC once again for their <br /> "smart" work on behalf of the City Council and community; with their recommen- <br /> dations well-thought-out. <br /> Councilmember McGehee expressed appreciation for the clear presentation, as well <br /> as the comparisons with other communities. <br /> Mayor Roe asked that when this item came before the City Council for formal ac- <br /> tion, that sufficient and advance notice be provided to the public to make sure they <br /> were aware of the item. <br /> b. Discuss Twin Lakes Alternative Urban Area-wide Review (AUAR) <br /> Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon and City Planner Thomas <br /> Paschke were available for this presentation. <br /> As noted,Mr. Trudgeon advised that the current AUAR expires in October of 2012; <br /> and provided three (3) options for consideration by the City Council, as detailed in <br /> the Request for Council Action dated September 17, 2012. <br /> Begin TL AUAR update using same 4 scenarios as previously used. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon noted that the scenarios needed to be updated realistically, such as <br /> not including a potential hospital use. <br /> Let the Twin lakes AUAR lapse and begin a new visioning process for Twin Lakes <br /> and complete a new AUAR once that visioning is complete. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.