1995_PSC_minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� MINUTE3 ROSEVILLE POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMI33ION MARCH 27, 1995 The meeting was called to order by Bob King, Chairman, at 5:15 p.m. Members Present: Others Present: Bob King and Jack W�idenbach. Police Chief Zelinsky, D�puty Chief A11eva, Officers Steve Frazer, Tom Perzichzlli, Rick Mathwig, Lorne Rosand, and Ann O'Neill. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the February 27, 1995, meeting were approved. Roll Call, Ayes: King and Weidenbach. Nays: None. NEW BUSINESS l. Chairman King recognized a letter received from LELS Loca� 112 Union Steward Steve Frazer. 2. Chief Zelinsky presented nine memos from officers requesting to take the S�rg�ant's test. All met the minimum requirements and appeared in order. King moved, Weidenbach seconded, to accept and certify the nine memos. Roll. Call, Ayes: King and Weidenbach. Nays: None. The names of the nine officers are: Rick Mathwig, Lorne Rosand, Steve Frazer, Tom Perzichilli, Michael Palermo, Surendran Sivarajah, Ann O'Neill, Michael Johnson, and Mark Reding. Off.icer O'Neili questioned whether or not the rale playing portion of the test would be videataped. The determination is that it was not going to be videotaped. Officer O'Neill expressed her concern tha't if she scored poorly on that portion of the test, she would be unab]�e to verify how she received her score_ She expressed the concern that she would not know if there was sexual bias in the testing. It was reiterated that the roZe player from PDI was trained in this process and has done hundreds af role plays. The Commission said that scaring of this portion of the test would be somewhat subjective. Chairman King noted her concern_ �fficer Frazer asked if PDI gave their notes on the meeting of February 27 as Harry Brull said he would do at the orientation meeting. Commissioner King said nothing was received by the Commission from PDI since the last meeting. Officer O'Neill asked why there was a change in the weights for the PromotabiZity Index. She mentioned it seemed like some- thing was done under the table. Commissioner King said that was not so; the change was due ta a continued discussion about the weights ga.ven to the Promotability Index section and whether or not supervisors should also be included in that input. Th� final decisian was to g�ve Promotability Index 10 percent of the test weight, with 5 percent going to peer evaluation and 5 percent to supervisory evaluation.