Laserfiche WebLink
City Financial S#a#us Major Findings <br />• Falcon Heights spends a higher percentage of its budget on debt service. This indicates that Roseville has <br />a higher portion of funds availab�e for discretionary services. <br />Roseville <br />Debt Service/Total Expenditures 21.4% <br />Falcon Heights <br />3�.5% <br />• Roseville spent a higher portion of its budget on capita� outlay in 1990. This reflec�s policy differences in the <br />cit�es. Falcon Heights infrastructure system is much smailer than Rose�ille's, making it more difficult �o <br />institute an annual capitai program for each portion of the infrastructure system. Rose�ille embarks on <br />annual improvement throughout its system. <br />Roseville <br />Capital Out�ay/Total Expenditures 34.7% <br />Falcon Heights <br />25.2% <br />• Falcon Meights State Aid Rate is higher than Roseville's, making Falcon Heights more susceptible to future <br />State aid reductions. <br />Roseville <br />Total State Aid/Tax Capacity 6.04% <br />F�I nHih <br />15.15% <br />- If state aid were equally reduced in both cities, Falcon Heights' taxpaying home owners would be <br />impacted more negatively than their Roseville counterparts. (Propor#ional[y, #here is less aid available to <br />take away in Roseville.} <br />- Statu�ory levy iimitations constrain each city's ability to raise taxes. <br />25 <br />ROS-0417 - 3430 - Working Draft <br />