CC_Minutes_2012_0924 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, September 24, 2012 Page 23 pense, she noted that that was not what she had heard from bond counsel earlier tonight. Based on Finance Director Miller's previous discussions with the City Council and staff recommendations to split the bond issue into smaller chunks to ensure that the bonds were bank qualified, Councilmember Pust noted that while it made sense to the City Council majority and was an important issue, Mr. Mil- ler's e-mail dated today and previously referenced indicated that this hadn't worked out and was no longer a good deal; and staff now recommended that the remaining bond issue phases be done all at once. In her review of the information provided, and from her perception, Coun- cilmember Pust opined that the real reason this was being pushed now was due to the upcoming November election, and with two (2) incumbents not running and risking the two (2) new Councilmembers being unknown quantities, they were being asked to make the decision tonight. While anticipating that the Council majority would proceed with the bond sale, Councilmember Pust stated that she continued to have concerns with the process itself. Recognizing that the Park Master Plan was a great process allowing for significant public input, Councilmember Pust opined that it still was not a sub- stitute for all citizens exercising their individual votes. Based on the dollar amounts at stake, 1/3 of Roseville's population being senior citizens, and the percentage of Roseville families receiving free or reduced lunches in the School system, Councilmember Pust advised that she could not in good conscience support the motion. In addition, as it related to the question of democracy, Councilmember Pust opined that five (5) elected people should not make the decision for those portions of Roseville's population previously referenced for a twenty(20) year period. Recognizing that he appeared to be the unpopular individual in the house to- night, Councilmember Johnson stated that was part of serving as an elected of- ficial; and expressed his appreciation for those who respectfully provided their testimony to the City Council. Noting that it was difficult to be in disagreement with some giving public testimony, Councilmember Johnson assured them that they had been heard, and he agreed to respectfully disagree with those speakers. Councilmember Johnson stated that it was his belief that the bulk of what was now required, the reason the fire stations and parks systems were in such disre- pair, and the need to now fully fund capital improvements to correct that infra- structure, was due to the neglect of past City Councils in deferring those ex- penditures and needed maintenance. Councilmember Johnson noted that the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Task Force, upon which both he and Mayor Roe had participated, had identified the need for many dollars to move the City's CIP program forward and address the $100 million deficit required to