Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 24, 2012 <br /> Page 27 <br /> adding up to a total of$600 million. While having a policy in place to prevent <br /> the City Council from spending significant monies without a referendum was a <br /> good policy to have, Mayor Roe noted that given the backlog of things not suf- <br /> ficiently maintained, as pointed out in 2006 by staff and representing a $15 mil- <br /> lion deficit at that time, had remained deferred. Mayor Roe questioned if the <br /> City Council could continue to not get those things done and leave it for the <br /> next City Council, as had been done in the past. While this City Council could <br /> make that choice as well, Mayor Roe noted that the majority had chosen not to <br /> do so, and while it was painful in the short-term, in the long-term it would leave <br /> the City better off in addressing those issues and other replacement needed <br /> could be taken care of adequately. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that, in order to implement the CIP funding, significant cuts <br /> had been made to the operating fund on a day-to-day basis to address that deficit <br /> over that twenty (20) year program; and opined that this fell in that same cate- <br /> gory. Mayor Roe opined that the City Council had a choice of going projects at <br /> a $2 million basis annually, or to do so on a faster track and fund it through <br /> bonding at current low interest rates and lower construction costs; to get the pro- <br /> jects off the books and moving forward, similar to the process of home owners <br /> for home improvements through use of financing over time and accepting a ma- <br /> jor impact during the initial short time. <br /> Mayor Roe admitted that this was not, nor had it been an easy decision to make, <br /> and recognized that the numbers were big; however, ultimately when looking <br /> back twenty (20) years from now, he thought they would prove to be the right <br /> decision and put the City in a stronger place, without spikes in annual levies. <br /> Mayor Roe advised that this was his rationale to support the motion, as it had <br /> been in 2011, and continued to be. <br /> In terms of property tax funding and those on fixed incomes, Mayor Roe noted <br /> that everyone on the City Council was well aware of that. Mayor Roe opined <br /> that the current system of financing government was a terrible system, but fi- <br /> nancing government with property taxes was unfortunately the only one availa- <br /> ble. Mayor Roe opined that the issue to be addressed was the unfairness of <br /> property tax funding, dependent on state legislative action; but reiterated that <br /> this was the only funding mechanism available. <br /> Mayor Roe advised that, when he ran for election, he had not intended to be a <br /> property tax raiser; however, he could not be irresponsible with taxpayer funds, <br /> and was charged with leaving the community better off than he found it, as it <br /> behooved each Councilmember to do. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mayor Roe and Finance Director <br /> Miller reviewed the CIP to get the unfunded utility balances zeroed out over that <br /> twenty (20) year period; and the phase in of those base rates over a two year pe- <br />