Laserfiche WebLink
121 <br />122 <br />123 <br />124 <br />125 <br />126 <br />127 <br />128 <br />129 <br />130 <br />131 <br />132 <br />133 <br />134 <br />135 <br />136 <br />137 <br />138 <br />139 <br />140 <br />141 <br />142 <br />143 <br />144 <br />145 <br />Page 4 of 10 <br />The recommendation was to increase the annual utility base fees by a total of $1.1 million in <br />2012 and an additional $1.1 million in 2013, and to maintain the total $2.2 million increase <br />permanently going forward. Approximately $850,000 of that amount was dedicated to Water <br />Utility capital funding, approximately $830,000 to Sanitary Sewer Utility capital funding, and <br />the remaining approximately $500,000 was dedicated to Stormwater Utility capital funding. <br />Total Impact of the 2011 Implementation Actions. <br />The implemented subcommittee recommendations from 2011 are graphically represented, <br />superimposed on the earlier graph of the problem (Figure 1 above), as follows: <br />Figure 2. With 2011 Recommended Solutions - All Funds. The red bars represent <br />cumulative annual capital costs, while the green area represents cumulative projected current <br />annual budgeted capital funding. The light blue area represents cumulative projected new <br />funding from new revenues. The narrow purple area between the green and light blue areas <br />represents cumulative new funding from operational budget cuts. All figures are in 2012 dollars. <br />As can be seen, even with implementation of the subcommittee recommendations in 2011, <br />significant work remains — primarily in the Parks, Pathways, Streets, and IT capital funding <br />areas, which were not addressed by the 2011 actions. <br />