Laserfiche WebLink
Page 7 of 10 <br />236 Of the $810,000 total increase in annual funding for Park Facilities and PIP over that 5 -year <br />237 period, about 20% is from additional property tax levy funding and about 80% is from <br />238 repurposing existing property tax levy funds. <br />239 <br />240 <br />241 Skating Center Facilities. Skating Center Facilities had been generally repaired, refurbished, or <br />242 replaced through Park Facilities capital funding. However, due to the multi- purpose nature of <br />243 the Skating Center, its funding is recommended to come from the Building Replacement Fund, <br />244 which was otherwise addressed by the Facilities funding recommendations implemented in 2011. <br />245 Currently (as of the 2012/13 biennial budget plan), $0 each year goes toward Skating Center <br />246 Facilities. Clearly, additional Facility funding for the Skating Center is required to meet its <br />247 capital replacement needs. (As a note, the identified capital Facilities needs discussed here for <br />248 the Skating Center are largely outside of the scope of the State bonding bill projects and the <br />249 funding from the Guidant grant.) <br />250 <br />251 The Subcommittee recommends using a combination of funding sources to address the shortfall, <br />252 as follows: <br />253 • In 2014, add an additional $200,000 of ongoing property tax levy funding for Skating <br />254 Center Facility capital needs. <br />255 • In 2018, repurpose the $335,000 ongoing annual levy that goes to debt service on existing <br />256 skating center geothermal project equipment certificates when they are retired. <br />257 <br />258 Of the $535,000 total increase in annual funding for Skating Center Facilities capital needs over <br />259 that 5 -year period, about 37% is from additional property tax levy funding and about 63% is <br />260 from repurposing existing property tax levy funds. <br />261 <br />262 <br />263 IT, Central Services, & Administration. These are additional areas of Equipment replacement <br />264 needs that were not addressed by the actions implemented in 2011. IT equipment needs are those <br />265 of the City and exclude those related to the provision of IT services to our Joint Powers partners. <br />266 Central Services equipment needs are related to the several copiers the City owns or leases for <br />267 various City facilities. Administration equipment needs come from the replacement of voting <br />268 machines, which the City continues to own even with the contract with Ramsey County to <br />269 administer our elections. Currently (as of the 2012/13 biennial budget plan), $50,000 of property <br />270 tax funding each year goes toward IT equipment needs (computers, routers, etc.) for the City of <br />271 Roseville, and about $5,000 goes toward Central Services or Administration equipment needs. <br />272 Without additional funding, the fund balances in both IT and Central Services will disappear <br />273 within 1 -2 years. <br />274 <br />275 The Subcommittee recommends using property tax levy funding to address the shortfalls, as <br />276 follows: <br />277 • In 2013, add an additional $160,000 of ongoing property tax levy funding for IT, Central <br />278 Services, and Admin. capital needs. <br />279 • In 2014, add an additional $75,000 of ongoing property tax levy funding, making the <br />280 ongoing total additional funding level $235,000 (100% of which comes from new <br />281 property tax levy funding). <br />