My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-12-04_PR_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2012
>
2012-12-04_PR_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2012 3:31:17 PM
Creation date
11/29/2012 3:08:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Tree Distribution by DBH Range <br /> 2000 <br /> 1800 1743 <br /> 1600 <br /> 1519 <br /> 1444 <br /> 1400 <br /> 1253 <br /> 1200 <br /> O 1000 <br /> � 800 <br /> 600 ! �, <br /> 570 <br /> j <br /> 400 359 <br /> 200 M <br /> 0 <br /> r/Ilt/1 <br /> 0-6 712 25-30 31+ <br /> DBH Runge <br /> In addition to s>ze, tion o 0' t� as >ns` d. The categories for condition included: <br /> excellent, good, fait, p� �f >� � c. ree was defined as a specimen tree, w hile <br /> good ti� healt d rigorous. 2 es of a tree in good condition include tight <br /> croiV 1�rm �g u>_ and no evidence of disease or pest problems. Fair condition <br /> / '>vned as gene>_a� althy'� � characteristics could include open croti�n and fair form. <br /> P00rsl diM) s detiftim s at 1 30 o of tree was declining, and other s>_gns could include <br /> s or structural <br /> girdlin 1. age. Lastlyr, dead condition was when the tree was identified as <br /> dead or 1�' �j. dead. All de' <br /> trees tivere reported to City staff for further inspection and <br /> maintenance. <br /> City of Roseville Public Tree Master Plan <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.