Laserfiche WebLink
maintenance representing the highest cost for LED as well as UPS as well; cost of <br /> each cobra head fixture at approximately $90, but the LED infrastructure cost <br /> currently about $300 until manufactures can reduce that cost based on economy of <br /> scale; replacement of bulbs versus the entire board and which was found the most <br /> efficient based on their life expectancy (23 years for a board); components (e.g. <br /> starter, ballast, bulb, other components) and their inability to be recycled at this <br /> time, but not identified as hazardous waste as they didn't contain mercury vapor, <br /> which is no longer usable in MN. <br /> Additional discussion included life expectancy of LED bulbs at approximately 15- <br /> 25 years; and potential reduction in operational and maintenance costs as LED <br /> lighting moves to the forefront, estimated at approximately 50%. <br /> Mr. Bieging noted that use of LED lighting for decorative will not be as effective, <br /> nor save money, due to their design and limited lighting capabilities and levels, <br /> since LED lights are more direct than conventional UPS fixtures with lighting <br /> reflected and refracted inside the fixtures and distribution patterns; as well as the <br /> public perception of LED lighting as more measured with the whiter light and <br /> allowing use of lower wattages as technologies improve. <br /> Ms. Jurek advised that it was Xcel's intent to conserve energy and pass that <br /> savings on to its customer base, as well as reducing overall emissions. <br /> Further discussion included off-peak power considerations and controls; <br /> directional lighting where needed through use of LED lights directed on streets <br /> and sidewalks for safety versus into customer's yards (e.g. keyhole to keyhole <br /> lighting); relative ease in retrofitting existing cobra head light standards with LED <br /> technology; and reluctance of Xcel to consider dimming street lights when needed <br /> less due to litigation issues, as well as other considerations. <br /> In conclusion, Mr. Bieging advised that new technologies were driving the future <br /> of outdoor lighting and the entire industry over the next 10-15 years, with Xcel <br /> hoping to be in a position of leadership with a strategic plan for replacing and <br /> updating outdoor street lighting systems. Mr. Bieging noted that there was a <br /> considerable amount of pressure to move this LED street light program forward in <br /> the Midwest, advising that this may prompt an earlier resolution. Mr. Bieging <br /> advised that studies for LED lighting in eastern and western states were more <br /> advance, primarily due to higher rate structures than currently realized in <br /> Midwestern states. <br /> Chair Vanderwall and Commissioners thanked Mr. Bieging and Ms. Jurek for <br /> their informative presentation. <br /> 6. Uniform Commission Code Proposal <br /> As previously requested by the PWETC, Mr. Schwartz provided a DRAFT copy <br /> of the proposed ordinance (Attachment A) being developed by staff to provide a <br /> Page 4 of 17 <br />