My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-10-23_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-10-23_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2012 11:45:09 AM
Creation date
12/4/2012 11:44:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/23/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Further discussion included use and simplicity of Rosenberg's Rules versus <br /> Robert's Rules for parliamentary processes; with Chair Vanderwall clarifying that <br /> the City Council had adopted Rosenberg's Rules as the official meeting protocol, <br /> but noted if and when the PWETC held public hearings, consideration may need <br /> to be included to allow them to do so and the process delegated to the body to <br /> proceed accordingly. <br /> Chair Vanderwall advised that he had also brought to City Manager Malinen's <br /> attention the current constraints in commissioners being unable to communicate <br /> amongst their members outside that correspondence being made part of the formal <br /> public record; and when or if exceptions were available for generic <br /> correspondence between members. <br /> While recognizing these constraints, Mr. Schwartz noted that those rules went <br /> beyond that of City Code, since they originated with State Statute and Open <br /> Meeting Law restrictions for communication outside a public meeting by a public <br /> body. <br /> Chair Vanderwall recognized those statutory restrictions, he opined that with <br /> ever-improving technology, those restrictions needed to be updated as well. <br /> Member Stenlund noted, in the general comments at the beginning of the <br /> ordinance, he thought more should be added on ethics, and the need for annual <br /> ethical training by commissioners or an annual waiver by members. <br /> Member Gjerdingen also noted the need to stipulate annual financial disclosure <br /> information by commissioners. <br /> Mr. Schwartz clarified that ethics training was not mandatory, and readily <br /> available along with general ethics operating procedures and processes available <br /> on the City's website. <br /> Chair Vanderwall suggested that, in lines 109-112 of the draft ordinance, mention <br /> of a handbook or framework of behavior may be appropriate. <br /> Member Stenlund noted that, if 2-4 year terms were adopted, he would no longer <br /> be eligible to serve; and while wanting more people to be involved in local <br /> government to obtain more and better ideas, he would be disappointed if no <br /> longer serving on the PWETC. <br /> Member DeBenedet noted that Roseville had a strong history of willing <br /> volunteers; however, he also noted that some commissions had been difficult to <br /> fill in the past. <br /> Chair Vanderwall noted line 420 and following in the document under <br /> "Duties/Functions," particularly the "maintaining an interest" phrase and <br /> Page 6 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.