My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_1210_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_1210_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2012 11:30:24 AM
Creation date
12/6/2012 4:30:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> Date: 12/10/2012 <br /> Item No.: 7.e <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br />Item Description: Award Contract for Demolition of the buildings on the PIK Terminal Co. <br />Limited Partnership property located at 2680/ 2690 Prior Avenue <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />B ACKGROUND 1 <br />On June 18, 2012, the City Council approved the Settlement agreement for the purchase of land 2 <br />from PIK Terminal Co. Limited Partnership. One of the terms of settlement included in this 3 <br />agreement was the City would undertake the demolition of the existing structures on the PIK 4 <br />parcels and PIK would be assessed all costs associated with the demolition (e.g. engineering 5 <br />reports, city staff time, building removal, etc.). The terms of the assessment would include: 6 <br /> A twelve year assessment with a two year repayment deferral with no interest accruing 7 <br />and a ten-year repayment schedule; 8 <br /> An interest rate of six percent 9 <br /> Full repayment of the assessment would be due upon sale of the PIK property. 10 <br />The City developed plans and specifications needed to demolish the buildings. Bids were 11 <br />opened on November 29, 2012. 12 <br />P OLICY O BJECTIVE 13 <br />The buildings in the PIK Terminal property are blighted and abandoned. The demolition will 14 <br />increase safety and aesthetics in the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area. 15 <br />Based on past practice, the City Council has awarded contracts to the lowest responsible bidder 16 <br />whose bid complies with the conditions within the specifications. The following is a summary 17 <br />of bids received for this project: 18 <br />BIDDER AMOUNT <br />Urban Companies $ 47,550.00 <br />Veit and Company, Inc. $ 50,478.00 <br />Carl Bolander & Sons Co. $ 74,175.00 <br />Belair Builders, Inc. $ 93,110.00 <br />Rachel Contracting $ 111,360.00 <br />Landwehr Contracting $ 122,935.00 <br />Frattalone Companies, Inc $ 132,800.00 <br />New Look Contracting $ 165,401.25 <br />Max Steininger, Inc. $ 197,916.00 <br />For this project, the apparent low bid is Urba n Companies of Rogers, Minnesota. Upon review 19 <br />of the bids, staff found that their bid did not comp ly with the project specifications. According 20
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.