res_9541 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE * * * * * * * * * * * * * Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly called held at the City Hall on Monday, the 27th day of April, 1998, at 6:30 P.M. The following members were present: Goedeke, Mastel, Maschka, Wiski, Wall; and and the following were absent: None. Member Maschka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 9541 RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE REVIEW PERIOD FOR PRESBYTERIAN HOMES HOUSING AND ASSISTED LIVING, INC. REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AT 2965 LINCOLN DRIVE (EAGLECREST) WHEREAS, Presbyterian Homes Housing and Assisted Living, Inc. have requested an amendment to a Planned Unit Development (EagleCrest), to allow for the increase in square footage of the building proposed for the northwest corner from 26,500 square feet to 32,900 square feet to allow for the construction of are-designed 36-unit dementia facility (PF2995); and WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this request on April 8, 1998; and WHEREAS, the City Council found that extending the review period should be extended to allow time for the City Attorney, Finance Director, and other staff to complete a review and update of the College Properties Development Agreement; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Roseville, Minnesota (the "City"), Ramsey County, Minnesota, that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99, the time line for agency review of the application of Presbyterian Homes Housing and Assisted Living, Inc. request for an amendment to a planned unit development at 2965 Lincoln Drive, be extended for 60 days, from May 8, 1998. to June 8. 1998. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member Wiski and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Goedeke, Mastel, Maschka, Wiski, Wall; and the following voted against the same: None.