Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 03,2012 <br /> Page 15 <br /> curred with Councilmember Pust to report the previous year's savings more <br /> prominent in reports to the City Council and public. Councilmember McGehee <br /> concurred as well. <br /> Councilmember Pust reviewed the pre-existing obligations, items included in <br /> the original 2012/2013 biennial budget, CIP Subcommittee recommended items, <br /> and new considerations (pages 1 and 2 of the RCA), and summarized her find- <br /> ings that the only things that were not already committed to and available for <br /> tonight's discussion were the two (2) new considerations. Councilmember Pust <br /> concurred with public comments made tonight that some employees in this cur- <br /> rent economy were not seeing a 2% increase this year, nor had they received <br /> comparable increases in the past two (2) years. Councilmember Pust further <br /> noted that in several recent years, or the past two (2) years, as was proposed for <br /> the City's employees; however, she also noted that in past years, employees did <br /> not receive any COLA, and that this 2% increase had been a conscious decision <br /> of the City Council majority. <br /> Councilmember Johnson noted that this proposed COLA did not fully address <br /> union contracts under which the City had an obligation as well. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that not all of the City's work force was eligible for the <br /> wage step program. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Pust, Mr. Miller clarified that the budget pro- <br /> vided a set aside of$55,000 in the 2013 budget to accommodate changes in the <br /> employer's cost for employee health care (e.g. premium increases from provid- <br /> ers). However, Mr. Miller noted that while negotiations to-date had proven fa- <br /> vorable for the City, a significant variable remained in the employee election <br /> process to change tiers of coverage and/or for new employees coming on board <br /> that could create swings in that fund. Mr. Miller advised that this was the ra- <br /> tionale in that allotment until the 2013 election was finalized. <br /> Councilmember Pust asked that staff closely monitor that fund, and provide an <br /> updated accounting in March or April of 2013 comparing that amount set aside <br /> with reality. <br /> Discussion ensued on the new considerations, with clarification that the City <br /> Council had approved the HRIS software after having deferred it for several <br /> years; and the Compensation Study's specific 2013 expenditure for the imple- <br /> mentation of the study results. <br /> Councilmembers Pust and Johnson concurred that those two (2) new considera- <br /> tions remained the only discussion points for tonight. <br />