Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,December 03, 2012 <br /> Page 21 <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted that the HRA was attempting to position them- <br /> selves so at such time as a property was identified and came forward, they could <br /> act on it. Councilmember Willmus referenced the Rice Street property that was <br /> lost and turned over. Councilmember Willmus advised that he was not support- <br /> ive of the proposed amendment, as it did not serve the intent of the requested <br /> funding initiative. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that before an arm of the City began buying <br /> property, she remained unconvinced that property could be purchased basically <br /> to acquire the land, with added demolition costs and material removal costs; and <br /> still make money on a bar lot. Councilmember McGehee opined that she was <br /> unsure of the economics of such a decision. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that it was not the intent of the program to allow for 100% <br /> recovery of HRA costs; but the loss was a cost to facilitate redevelopment of the <br /> property, as outlined in detail in prior HRA presentations to the City Council. <br /> Roll Call (Amendment) <br /> Ayes: McGehee. <br /> Nays: Pust; Johnson; Willmus; and Roe. <br /> Motion failed. <br /> Roll Call (Original Motion) <br /> Ayes: Pust; Johnson; Willmus; and Roe. <br /> Nays: McGehee. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> e. Adopt a Resolution Establishing the 2013 Utility Rates <br /> Mr. Miller provided a brief presentation summarizing staff's analysis, previous <br /> City Council actions to-date, and recommendations for 2013 Utility Rate Ad- <br /> justments, as detailed in the RCA dated December 3, 2012. <br /> Mr. Miller noted that the utility rate adjustments were to address over $66 mil- <br /> lion in unfunded and/or previously deferred water and sewer infrastructure <br /> needs; and had been recommended by the Council-appointed CIP Task Force <br /> and the Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commission (PWETC). <br /> Mr. Miller noted that the City Council in 2011 had approved a two-phase pro- <br /> gram in 2012 and 2013 to address the funding gap, representing a significant <br /> 60-65% increase in the base rate for water, sanitary and storm sewer, with only <br /> inflationary increases proposed thereafter. Mr. Miller advised that customers <br /> would realize an average of $6.00 per month in 2012 and another $6.00 per <br /> month on average in 2013. <br /> Mr. Miller reviewed costs outside the control of the City of Roseville, including <br /> a projected 3% increase for the City's purchase of water from the City of St. <br />