Laserfiche WebLink
Single -stream versus dual stream recycling management Do the benefits justify the mean... <br />Carl I CI.>Km I Snn.NNe I Ams U. I ememil I RSS <br />Q Registers Log In <br />RECYCLING I EVENTS I COLLECTION AND TRANSFER I LANDFILL I su STAINABIIry I FLEETS I INDUSTRY I RESOURCES <br />Single- stream Versus Dual Stream Recycling <br />Management: Do the benefits justify the means? <br />Stream A. mum I harmes+ Sur 17,1112 <br />SHARE F—Tresel R.mmmmdis COMMEN>s, <br />Single stream versus dual stream recycling me "'Am"ll <br />management Do the benefits justify the means? Single stream Versus Dual Stream <br />Refycling Management Do the benefits <br />Justifythe means? <br />Quick and DNM <br />Aiming High <br />Declaimer: nas study ones conducted using municipal solid waste datafrom between <br />Togs and 2009 (the most recent data available at the time of the study). Aafac¢ and <br />figures are correct in relation m the data used. <br />Florida wants to increase its recycling Tate to 75 percent by the Year 2020 and single- <br />stream Teeyding maybe one way to help reach that goal. Although Mme are many <br />supporters and detractors for single -meam recycling, a dOOOT look at how it has affected <br />Florida since its intrepid Onin 2005 may hop range the Luce Tisza[;. aype rforming a <br />quantitative analysis on the berefits Of single meam and its effect On recycling rates and <br />contamination rates in Florida, and by comparing those rates to counties that still <br />maintain dual -meam recycling systems and contamination rates of the host counties Of <br />the end use mills, a better understanding Of the tare effects of single stream can be <br />realized. <br />Th Tessemelf analysed whether single-meamrecych% inthe state of Florida was MOTO <br />brne5dd, environmentally, and economically, than dual stream recycling. It attempted to <br />determine whether single-stream recycling encouraged residents to increase tl <br />recycling participation and, if s0, ifthe site of the Firm, the Freedom from sorting Or the <br />al litym include more materials wee responsible for the potentialineease. In addition, <br />the condmiautionlevel Of Teeydables anteing single-meampracessing facilities and and <br />useTTIMS was compared to that anteing dual -meam processing facilities to deto mineff <br />more or less contsminationwas being SOM to processing facilities or and- usempHis as a <br />rlsson Of the convesionto single stream. <br />Hot Toga <br />Route Optimization <br />Alternative Fuels <br />Zero Waste <br />Food Waste <br />E Waste Acquistlions <br />Landfill Gas to mers, safety <br />Reryclinq Home <br />Wastenge I ul v <br />a GROW <br />JOIN NYO WITH US <br />ON -OE <br />MAND <br />VIDEO LIBRARY <br />�II <br />- <br />USEDEDUIPMENT- mY,SELUnitre. <br />http: / /waste360.com /recycling- facilities -mrfs /single- stream- versus - dual - stream - recycling -m... <br />