Laserfiche WebLink
people who have returned It vacation or finished cleaving out their home. <br />What Other Cities Do <br />Some Minnesota cities have begun addressing storage and conve- <br />es by using wheeled 64 gallon cuts for recycling. <br />Brooklyn Park Brooklyn Center, Crystal and New Hope are <br />sing a system called single stream sdl recyclable material goes <br />into a single cut In a plot program in 2001 theses cities found <br />participation went from 58 percent under to current two sort bin <br />system, to 74 87 percent participation in the single sort system. <br />Newspapers in o SSngle They averaged 23 pounds of recycling set out per household <br />Steam Recycling Cart versus 18 pounds per household with the bin system. <br />While His appears to be moving forward Here are some significant concerns about single stream <br />recycling. The major drawbacks are inability to monitor what is collected at the curbside and <br />additional processing at the facility both of which lead to contamination ofrecyclables. <br />Data on current single str eam recycling facilities shows the amount of material collected that is <br />not recyclable (out [Mows) is 5% or greater and the material not able to be recycled (residual) to <br />be1525 %. Numbers on Waste Management fadi ty in Minneapolis show a lower ate of <br />residual but are preliminary because the facility opened in January 2002 and is not running at full <br />capacity sdso the numbers will be skewed because single sort materials are mixed with two sort <br />and source separated (seven sorts) systems. MotherfactorinfluencingthisisthatWasteMan <br />— <br />agement collects broken glass and sends it to its landfills for use as drainage or cover material. <br />That material is not included in the facility's residual ate even though it ends up in a 1ME11. <br />Residual for Roseville 's current two sort system when it was being processed at a two sort <br />facility was approximately 7 percent, out throws No set to t %. Thus He net mount of material <br />that is successfully processed in a single str eam system can go down even Hough the amount <br />collected goes up. <br />It s not necessarily the single stream method that leads to increased participation. In 2001 St <br />Paul s Eureka Recycling that runs recycling programs for He City conducted a plot program on <br />recycling behaviors. The study included single stream with carts, two stream with cuts, two <br />stream with bins with weekly collection and two stream with bins with every other week colleen <br />lion as well as a pilot area using St Paul s current seven sort system. Statistics show the most <br />significant gains in recycling tonnages collected and in tonnages successfully processed where in <br />the area that had weekly collection using bins and in the area that had biweekly collection using <br />wheeled cants. This suggests that dements of convenience such as carts or weekly collection are <br />what increase participation instead of being able to put recyclables into one container . <br />Meanwhile Roseville residents seem cool to He idea of using a single stream system. In the 2002 <br />survey, Roseville homeowners were asked if they would like to use a single stream system. Fifly <br />— <br />onepercentsaidyes , 49 percent said no The group that said yes was asked how much more per <br />month they would be willing to pay to use a single stream program. Thirty nine percent said they <br />would not be willing to pay more while 24 percent said they would pay $2 more a month and 19 <br />percent said $1. <br />