My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-01-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-01-22_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2013 9:44:25 AM
Creation date
1/17/2013 3:42:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/22/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
people who have returned It vacation or finished cleaving out their home. <br />What Other Cities Do <br />Some Minnesota cities have begun addressing storage and conve- <br />es by using wheeled 64 gallon cuts for recycling. <br />Brooklyn Park Brooklyn Center, Crystal and New Hope are <br />sing a system called single stream sdl recyclable material goes <br />into a single cut In a plot program in 2001 theses cities found <br />participation went from 58 percent under to current two sort bin <br />system, to 74 87 percent participation in the single sort system. <br />Newspapers in o SSngle They averaged 23 pounds of recycling set out per household <br />Steam Recycling Cart versus 18 pounds per household with the bin system. <br />While His appears to be moving forward Here are some significant concerns about single stream <br />recycling. The major drawbacks are inability to monitor what is collected at the curbside and <br />additional processing at the facility both of which lead to contamination ofrecyclables. <br />Data on current single str eam recycling facilities shows the amount of material collected that is <br />not recyclable (out [Mows) is 5% or greater and the material not able to be recycled (residual) to <br />be1525 %. Numbers on Waste Management fadi ty in Minneapolis show a lower ate of <br />residual but are preliminary because the facility opened in January 2002 and is not running at full <br />capacity sdso the numbers will be skewed because single sort materials are mixed with two sort <br />and source separated (seven sorts) systems. MotherfactorinfluencingthisisthatWasteMan <br />— <br />agement collects broken glass and sends it to its landfills for use as drainage or cover material. <br />That material is not included in the facility's residual ate even though it ends up in a 1ME11. <br />Residual for Roseville 's current two sort system when it was being processed at a two sort <br />facility was approximately 7 percent, out throws No set to t %. Thus He net mount of material <br />that is successfully processed in a single str eam system can go down even Hough the amount <br />collected goes up. <br />It s not necessarily the single stream method that leads to increased participation. In 2001 St <br />Paul s Eureka Recycling that runs recycling programs for He City conducted a plot program on <br />recycling behaviors. The study included single stream with carts, two stream with cuts, two <br />stream with bins with weekly collection and two stream with bins with every other week colleen <br />lion as well as a pilot area using St Paul s current seven sort system. Statistics show the most <br />significant gains in recycling tonnages collected and in tonnages successfully processed where in <br />the area that had weekly collection using bins and in the area that had biweekly collection using <br />wheeled cants. This suggests that dements of convenience such as carts or weekly collection are <br />what increase participation instead of being able to put recyclables into one container . <br />Meanwhile Roseville residents seem cool to He idea of using a single stream system. In the 2002 <br />survey, Roseville homeowners were asked if they would like to use a single stream system. Fifly <br />— <br />onepercentsaidyes , 49 percent said no The group that said yes was asked how much more per <br />month they would be willing to pay to use a single stream program. Thirty nine percent said they <br />would not be willing to pay more while 24 percent said they would pay $2 more a month and 19 <br />percent said $1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.