Laserfiche WebLink
63 <br />Pros <br />Cons <br />Option 1 <br />Residents are familiar with it <br />Participation rates and tonnages <br />Current <br />are stagnant <br />System <br />Less residual and out throw <br />Higher collection cost <br />Lower processing cost <br />Difficulty of getting bins to the <br />Bins can be modified to add <br />curb <br />lids and wheels <br />Storage concerns inhibiting full <br />Lowest cost ($2.05 per <br />participation <br />household, per month) <br />Option 2 <br />Abates storage concerns because <br />Difficulty getting bins to curb <br />Weekly <br />of less build up <br />Higher collection cost <br />Collection <br />Less residual and out throws <br />Less convenient <br />Lower processing cost <br />Increased truck traffic <br />Bins can be modified to add lids <br />and wheels <br />88% of residents surveyed said <br />every other week collection is often <br />enough <br />Higher Cost ($2.10 -2.25 per house- <br />hold, per month) <br />Convenient (no sorting) <br />Higher cost of processing <br />Option 3 <br />Single <br />Wheeled and covered containers <br />Higher residual and out throw rates <br />Stream <br />Lower cost of collection <br />Only one vendor <br />Provides additional storage space <br />If City doesn't own bins, would <br />have to buy a new set if new vendor <br />Less truck traffic because trucks <br />don't fill as quickly since they can <br />Waste Management has less incen- <br />compact material <br />tive to recover glass and sell it to a <br />manufacturer for recycling <br />Higher participation/ More ton- <br />nage collected <br />Residents surveyed split 50150 on <br />whether they want it <br />Highest cost ($2.25 per household <br />per month) <br />63 <br />