Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix B <br />Table 12 <br />Comparison of Dual Stream Routes During Pilot <br />Weekly vs. Bi- weekly Collection <br />nree samples were sorted trom the I uesday routes. <br />%Three samples were sorted from the Friday routes. <br />J The totals may not equal the sum of the material categories due to rounding. <br />As shown in Table 12, the upper and lower confidence intervals for each of the <br />material categories of the weekly dual stream collection routes were not significantly <br />different than the bi- weekly dual stream (control) routes. Thus, the composition of the <br />materials collected did not significantly change. <br />As for the quantities of materials collected, Table 13 below reflects the weights of the <br />quantities collected for each route. <br />Table 13 <br />Comparison of Dual Stream Bi- Weekly vs. Weekly Collection (Tuesday) <br />Total Quantities Collected by Route Before and During Pilot <br />July September October <br />(bi- weekly) (weekly) (weekly) <br />Total Quantities Collected <br />(Tons) 8,150 5,650 4,925 <br />It appears that on a monthly basis, the weekly collection would result in greater <br />quantities collected than bi- weekly collection. However, because the data set is <br />limited, we cannot draw a definitive conclusion without additional pilot data <br />B-12 B1605 <br />Tuesday (Weekly) Route' <br />Friday (Bi- weekly) Routez <br />(Control) <br />Statistically <br />90% Confidence <br />90% Confidence <br />Significant <br />Material <br />Interval <br />Interval <br />Difference <br />Lower <br />Upper <br />Lower Upper <br />Category <br />Mean <br />Mean <br />Paper <br />65.4% <br />62.5% <br />68.3% <br />59.5% <br />53.9% 65.1% <br />Metals <br />7.4% <br />5.8% <br />9.0% <br />6.7% <br />6.0% 7.5% <br />(lass <br />13.6% <br />8.3% <br />19.0% <br />22.2% <br />14.5% 29.8% <br />Plastic <br />9.9% <br />7.7% <br />12.0% <br />8.6% <br />6.3% 10.9% <br />Contaminants <br />3.7% <br />2.6% <br />4.9% <br />3.0% <br />2.5% 3.5% <br />Total3 <br />100% <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />100% <br />n/a n/a <br />nree samples were sorted trom the I uesday routes. <br />%Three samples were sorted from the Friday routes. <br />J The totals may not equal the sum of the material categories due to rounding. <br />As shown in Table 12, the upper and lower confidence intervals for each of the <br />material categories of the weekly dual stream collection routes were not significantly <br />different than the bi- weekly dual stream (control) routes. Thus, the composition of the <br />materials collected did not significantly change. <br />As for the quantities of materials collected, Table 13 below reflects the weights of the <br />quantities collected for each route. <br />Table 13 <br />Comparison of Dual Stream Bi- Weekly vs. Weekly Collection (Tuesday) <br />Total Quantities Collected by Route Before and During Pilot <br />July September October <br />(bi- weekly) (weekly) (weekly) <br />Total Quantities Collected <br />(Tons) 8,150 5,650 4,925 <br />It appears that on a monthly basis, the weekly collection would result in greater <br />quantities collected than bi- weekly collection. However, because the data set is <br />limited, we cannot draw a definitive conclusion without additional pilot data <br />B-12 B1605 <br />