My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_1203_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_1203_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:41:20 PM
Creation date
1/25/2013 2:41:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
attendance, ethics violation, or failure to complete the annual disclosure of financial interest <br />�. statement. <br />s<��� Line 79 defines an unexcused absence as a commissioner not notifying staff prior to the meeting <br />: of their absence. The following paragraph addresses the number of ineetings a commissioner <br />� could miss before notifying the City Council. We ask for guidance on what is considered an <br />. excused/unexcused absence and whether there is a threshold for missed meetings. <br />�.: Line ll2 states that all regular meetings of a quorum of a commission shall be conducted in a <br />. public facility. One commission asked whether a meeting at a church or a community room <br />would be allowed. We believe that as long as a commission complies with the open meeting <br />� laws, and the facility hosting the meeting agrees that it is open to the public, the criteria would <br />� be met. <br />- The proposed commission code updates bring consistency to all commissions. Each commission <br />� code clarifies its establishment, duties and functions and purpose. <br />��� � The language in the Planning Commission code is slightly different because it includes language <br />addressing its statutory requirements. Based on discussions with Community Development <br />- Director Patrick Trudgeon and the Planning Commission Chair, we have proposed language <br />��� changes to the procedure for adopting the City Comprehensive Plan. <br />as` POLICY OBJECTIVE <br />�� Establish a City Code with consistent policies for all commissions to ensure that City Council, <br />: commissioners and staff have a clear understanding of the role and responsibilities of each <br />.. commission. <br />� FINANCIAL IMPACTS <br />� None <br />':� STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />. Review the proposed ordinance and provide guidance on: <br />. • Removal with/without cause <br />� • Excused/unexcused absences; threshold for number of missed meetings <br />�,� • Meeting at a public facility <br />� • Other <br />� Motion to approve proposed ordinance. <br />6;� REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION <br />���, Review the proposed ordinance and provide guidance on: <br />��� � • Removal without cause <br />e • Excused/unexcused absences <br />c� • Meeting at a public facility <br />e � • Other <br />Motion to approve proposed ordinance. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.