Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment B <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br />OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � <br />1 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />2 of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 28th day of January, <br />3 2013, at 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />4 The following members were present: and the following were absent: . <br />5 Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />0 <br />RESOLUTION No. <br />7 RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT <br />8 FOR PIK TERMINAL DEMOLITION PROJECT <br />9 WHEREAS, pursuant to request for quotations for the improvement, according to the plans <br />10 and specifications thereof on file in the office of the City Engineer, said quotes were <br />11 received on Wednesday, January 16, 2013, at 12:00 p.in., opened and tabulated according to <br />12 law and the following quotes were received complying with the request for quotations: <br />BIDDER AMOUNT <br />Urban Companies $ 39,480.00 <br />Veit and Company, Inc. $ 64,159.00 <br />Carl Bolander & Sons Co. $ 74,375.00 <br />Frattalone Com anies, Inc $ 116,500.00 <br />13 WHEREAS, it appears that Urban Companies of St. Paul, Minnesota, is the lowest <br />14 responsible bidder at the tabulated price of $50,478.00, and <br />15 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br />16 Minnesota: <br />17 l. The Mayor and Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract <br />18 with Urban Companies of St. Paul, Minnesota, for $39,480.00 in the name of the <br />19 City of Roseville for the above improvements according to the plans and <br />20 specifications thereof heretofore approved by the City Council and on file in the <br />21 office of the City Engineer. <br />22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br />23 Minnesota: <br />24 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , <br />25 and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />26 and the following voted against the same: . <br />27 WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />