Laserfiche WebLink
�°* r r��,°a *^ �°*°�;�° .,,�°*�°r � ���°there was insufficient <br />Council sii�ort to implement..- c�-�����cMloi�z <br />Foster youth leadership and ❑ High School Student developed and administered survey to all <br />development Roseville Area High School students r.s loin <br />❑ Hired, trained and developed youth through Roseville Parks and <br />Recreation jobs r.a�oin <br />❑ Worked with high school honor society on community service <br />projects 2011 cB roi>> <br />❑ Worked with three significant Eagle Scout Projects in 2011 ia �oil� <br />❑ Ongoing Youth representation on the Parks ai�d Recreation <br />Commission z,a Ioi�1 <br />❑ Three Youth representatives on the Parks and Recreation Master Plan <br />update LB loill <br />❑ Added three youth representatives to the Human Rights Commission. <br />WJM 4/11 <br />❑ Re-implementation of the Police Explorers Program in 2008. cs 3io9 <br />❑ Improved relatively new Leaders in Training (LIT) program. No new <br />programs have begun at this time. z.B �ios <br />Citywide transportation system ❑ Will explore opportunities for connection from new Park N Ride <br />facility. �s 3io9 <br />❑ Researching possibilities of moving youngsters to and from programs <br />and facilities. ia �ios <br />Update Master Plans (to include parks ❑ Joint Coininittee of the Parks and Recreation Commission and PWET <br />and community facilities) throughout established to review and �rioritize trails and natural resources portion <br />Parks & Recreation System. of the Park and Recreation Renewal Pro�ram — LB 10/12 <br />Parks and Recreation Renewal Program p LHB Consulting identified and approved as Lead Consultant — LB <br />Underwav LB 1/13 10/12 <br />❑ Parks and Recreation Renewal Pro�ram — Worlc Plan Identified LB <br />1/13 <br />❑ Identified and approved procurement method —Best Value <br />Procurement as a foundation of PRRP r.B rilz <br />❑ Partial Funding approved for Park and Recreation Renewal Program — <br />program identified z,B lila <br />❑ Decision made on implementation plan and preferred funding z,s �oi�1� <br />❑ Implementation plan and funding options'�RidcntificdLa loill <br />❑ Established short term and long term implementation plan with City <br />Council, Parks and Recreation Commission and CommunityLa �oill <br />❑ Established Master Plan Citizen Organizing Team, Noveinber 2010 z.B <br />1 /11 <br />❑ Established Master Plan Implementation Process, November 2010 LB <br />1 /11 <br />❑ Adopted Updated Master Plan, November 2010 cB Ii11 <br />❑ Master Plan Process, September 2009 — November 2010 z.s �ilr <br />❑ City Council authorized an agreement with LHB/Cornejo to lead the <br />System Master Plan Update Ls 9io9 <br />❑ Received nine proposals, will interview three. Plan to make <br />recommendation in June or July 2009 z,B �in9 <br />❑ Received nine proposals, will interview three. Plan to make <br />recommendation in June or July 2009 z.s �io9 <br />❑ RFPs issued, proposals received and analyzed. Plan to bring to City <br />Council in March, 2009 for consideration. Difficult as no funding for <br />the project has been identified. La 3ioy <br />❑ Pathway Master Plan approved by City Council in September. �s loios <br />❑ RFP being finalized with Parks and Recreation Commission. Will <br />