Laserfiche WebLink
Recycling Pilot Program Summary <br />Table 1 <br />Pilot Study Components <br />Selection of Pilot Areas <br />The City selected pilot areas of 330 -360 single - family homes — the approximate size <br />of one full collection route. The pilot route selections were made after a review of <br />U.S. Census data and discussions with Waste Management staff. Each area was <br />roughly similar in demographics except that a second single- stream area, called the <br />Contrast area, was selected that featured newer homes and more affluent residents. A <br />control route of comparable size was also selected that had no changes in collection <br />method. The area chosen for the Control route had a slightly higher average income <br />level than all the other test areas, except for the single- stream contrast area. <br />Time Period <br />For each pilot area, residents' behavior was monitored in a two -month "Before" period <br />(June — July 2004) followed by a four -month "During" period (August — November <br />2004). Data from certain weeks were excluded from the data analysis to avoid bias. <br />These included: <br />■ the week of July 4 during the "Before" period; <br />■ the first two weeks of the "During" period, because information had just been sent <br />out to residents of the non - Control pilot areas, and previous studies have shown <br />there is an initial surge of participation that results from direct contact; and <br />6 DRAFT B1605 <br />Monday <br />Monday <br />Tuesday <br />Wednesday <br />Thursday <br />Friday <br />Single- <br />Single- <br />Increased <br />Increased <br />Larger Bin <br />Control <br />Stream <br />Stream <br />Frequency <br />Education <br />Capacity <br />(Current <br />Contrast <br />System) <br />Frequency of <br />Every other <br />Every other <br />Weekly <br />Every other <br />Every other <br />Every other <br />Collection <br />week <br />week <br />week <br />week <br />week <br />Bins /Carts <br />64- gallon <br />64- gallon <br />18- gallon bin <br />18- gallon bin <br />Two 22- <br />18- gallon bin <br />cart <br />cart <br />gallon bins <br />with wheels <br />Added <br />Only <br />Only <br />Only <br />Extra <br />Only <br />None <br />Education <br />pertaining to <br />pertaining to <br />pertaining to <br />educational <br />pertaining to <br />new sorting <br />new sorting <br />new <br />materials <br />new bin <br />system <br />system <br />frequency of <br />capacity <br />collection <br />Demographics <br />Similar <br />Newer <br />Similar <br />Similar <br />Similar <br />Slightly <br />homes & <br />higher <br />more <br />average <br />affluent than <br />income than <br />other pilot <br />other pilot <br />areas <br />areas except <br />Contrast <br />Selection of Pilot Areas <br />The City selected pilot areas of 330 -360 single - family homes — the approximate size <br />of one full collection route. The pilot route selections were made after a review of <br />U.S. Census data and discussions with Waste Management staff. Each area was <br />roughly similar in demographics except that a second single- stream area, called the <br />Contrast area, was selected that featured newer homes and more affluent residents. A <br />control route of comparable size was also selected that had no changes in collection <br />method. The area chosen for the Control route had a slightly higher average income <br />level than all the other test areas, except for the single- stream contrast area. <br />Time Period <br />For each pilot area, residents' behavior was monitored in a two -month "Before" period <br />(June — July 2004) followed by a four -month "During" period (August — November <br />2004). Data from certain weeks were excluded from the data analysis to avoid bias. <br />These included: <br />■ the week of July 4 during the "Before" period; <br />■ the first two weeks of the "During" period, because information had just been sent <br />out to residents of the non - Control pilot areas, and previous studies have shown <br />there is an initial surge of participation that results from direct contact; and <br />6 DRAFT B1605 <br />