Laserfiche WebLink
Recycling Pilot Program Summary <br />• "During" versus "Before." The single- stream routes yielded increased <br />percentages of paper compared to the same areas collected as dual- stream routes <br />in the "Before" period. <br />• "During" versus `Before." The single- stream routes generated decreased <br />percentages of metals, glass and plastics compared to the same areas collected as <br />dual - stream routes in the "Before" period. <br />Dual- Stream <br />• "During" versus `Before." The composition of materials collected in the <br />combined "During" dual- stream pilot areas was not significantly different from <br />the composition compared to the same areas in the "Before" period. <br />• "During" versus "During." The composition of materials collected in each of the <br />"During" dual- stream pilot areas (Weekly, Two Bins, Education) were not <br />statistically different from each other. <br />Non - Targeted Materials <br />• The percentages of non - targeted materials (at the curb) in the single- stream routes <br />were higher than the percentages of non - targeted materials found on the same <br />routes collected as dual- stream routes in the "Before" period. <br />• "During" versus "During." The percentages of non - targeted materials in the <br />single- stream routes were higher than the percentages of non - targeted materials <br />found in the combined "During" dual- stream pilot routes. <br />The overall results from the analysis reflect that the composition of materials collected <br />for recycling changed significantly with single - stream but did not change significantly <br />with any of the dual- stream variations (increased frequency, increased capacity, <br />increased education). <br />Tonnages of Material Collected and Processed for Recovery <br />The overall goal of this pilot program was to help the City refine its curbside recycling <br />program to capture more recyclable material. Thus, this section includes an analysis <br />of how much additional material was recovered in each of the tested pilot approaches. <br />As discussed in the Pilot Design and Methodology section, a key issue is how to <br />address material that is collected at the curb but is not ultimately recovered and <br />recycled. Such contamination or residuals falls into three categories: <br />• Non - targeted materials, collected at the curb; <br />• Processing residuals from the MRF; and <br />• Contaminants in marketed product (e.g., in bales sold to end - markets). <br />Comparison of Tonnages Collected During Pilot Collection Routes <br />The first step in comparing the tonnages was to develop average gross weights (all <br />tonnages, including non - targeted materials) collected per route for each week of the <br />B1605 DRAFT 9 <br />