My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-02-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-02-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2013 11:51:02 AM
Creation date
2/21/2013 11:21:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/26/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Recycling Pilot Program Summary <br />• "During" versus "Before." The single- stream routes yielded increased <br />percentages of paper compared to the same areas collected as dual- stream routes <br />in the "Before" period. <br />• "During" versus `Before." The single- stream routes generated decreased <br />percentages of metals, glass and plastics compared to the same areas collected as <br />dual - stream routes in the "Before" period. <br />Dual- Stream <br />• "During" versus `Before." The composition of materials collected in the <br />combined "During" dual- stream pilot areas was not significantly different from <br />the composition compared to the same areas in the "Before" period. <br />• "During" versus "During." The composition of materials collected in each of the <br />"During" dual- stream pilot areas (Weekly, Two Bins, Education) were not <br />statistically different from each other. <br />Non - Targeted Materials <br />• The percentages of non - targeted materials (at the curb) in the single- stream routes <br />were higher than the percentages of non - targeted materials found on the same <br />routes collected as dual- stream routes in the "Before" period. <br />• "During" versus "During." The percentages of non - targeted materials in the <br />single- stream routes were higher than the percentages of non - targeted materials <br />found in the combined "During" dual- stream pilot routes. <br />The overall results from the analysis reflect that the composition of materials collected <br />for recycling changed significantly with single - stream but did not change significantly <br />with any of the dual- stream variations (increased frequency, increased capacity, <br />increased education). <br />Tonnages of Material Collected and Processed for Recovery <br />The overall goal of this pilot program was to help the City refine its curbside recycling <br />program to capture more recyclable material. Thus, this section includes an analysis <br />of how much additional material was recovered in each of the tested pilot approaches. <br />As discussed in the Pilot Design and Methodology section, a key issue is how to <br />address material that is collected at the curb but is not ultimately recovered and <br />recycled. Such contamination or residuals falls into three categories: <br />• Non - targeted materials, collected at the curb; <br />• Processing residuals from the MRF; and <br />• Contaminants in marketed product (e.g., in bales sold to end - markets). <br />Comparison of Tonnages Collected During Pilot Collection Routes <br />The first step in comparing the tonnages was to develop average gross weights (all <br />tonnages, including non - targeted materials) collected per route for each week of the <br />B1605 DRAFT 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.