My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-02-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2013
>
2013-02-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2013 11:51:02 AM
Creation date
2/21/2013 11:21:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/26/2013
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Recycling Pilot Program Summary <br />Comparison of Bi- Weekly Routes <br />Table 5 shows the following results: <br />• "During" versus `Before." The single- stream routes resulted in statistically <br />significant increases in total tonnages recovered, even when their relatively high <br />portions of non - targeted materials were subtracted out, as compared to the same <br />areas collected as dual- stream routes in the "Before" period. <br />• "During" versus `Before." The Larger Bin Capacity route resulted in a <br />statistically significant increase in total tonnage recovered, net of non - targeted <br />materials, as compared to the same area collected in the "Before" period. <br />• Tonnages recovered (net of non - targeted materials) for the other dual- stream pilot <br />areas were not statistically significantly different "During" versus "Before." <br />Tables 3 through 5 compared the pilot routes in which the recyclable materials were <br />collected every other week. Because the Tuesday pilot route was collected weekly, <br />the pounds collected per household were not comparable to those collected every other <br />week, so a comparison of the weekly routes was conducted separately, as discussed <br />below. <br />Comparison of Weekly (Tuesday) Routes <br />During the pilot, the average gross pounds of recyclable material collected per <br />household on the weekly route was 14.95 pounds with lower and upper ranges of <br />10.96 and 18.94 respectively. The average pounds of non - targeted materials per <br />household was .55 pounds per week, resulting in the net pounds per household per <br />week of 14.40 pounds with lower and upper ranges of 10.41 and 18.39. It should be <br />noted that some residents on the weekly route continued to set out their recyclable <br />materials every other week, even though they were offered weekly collection. <br />The effects of weekly collection of recyclable materials can be compared to every <br />other week collection on an annual basis. Table 6 below shows the projected annual <br />pounds per household for each route, based on the average pounds collected per <br />collection event during the pilot, net non - targeted materials. <br />14 DRAFT B1605 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.