2013_0225_packet amended - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

The citizen’s questions raised to the Council are directly related to the now defunct Gang Strike Force and not my Department. I do not have intimate details of the Gang Strike Force’s former operations but what has been established is some members of the Gang Strike Force disregarded state and federal statutes which dictate the process of seizing and ultimately forfeiting property from suspects in criminal activity. These web links will allow access to expanded information on forfeiture guidelines and regulations. Forfeitures related to aggravated DWI offenses: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=169A.63 Forfeitures related to other crimes: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=609.531 Model policies of POST: https://dps.mn.gov/entity/post/model-policies-learning- objectives/Pages/default.aspx The citizen’s questions also address the expenditure of forfeiture funds. State statutes mandate the funds are to be used to “supplement” law enforcement ’s activities and budgets. Historically, the Department has used forfeited funds related to aggravated DWI offenses to supplement its efforts in combating DWI. The Department has used forfeited funds related to other crimes in a more general sense in supplementing budgetary limitations. Many times expenses related to the Roseville members of East Metro SWAT are paid by this forfeiture account. All expenditures are authorized by the Chief of Police and paid by the Finance Department. There is no manner to realistically forecast expected expenditures of these accounts as forfeiture statutes mandate the funds be used to “supplement” the financial needs of a law enforcement agency and not replace budgetary funding. The forfeiture accounts have been used to bridge the CIP shortfall and actual needs of the Department in effectively and efficiently providing public safety functions to the citizens, businesses and visitors to Roseville. There are many day to day operational items that have been purchased by these funds to include: automobile window tint meters, Tasers, legal defense related to forfeitures which is outside the contract of the city attorney, preliminary alcohol breath test meters, over $100,000 was used to purchase the Department’s current mobile computers, Police Reserve appreciation dinner, and many other uses. I expect future expenditures will be similar to the past. I hope this memorandum provides enough guidance on the criminal forfeiture process and am willing to answer additional questions.