My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0211
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2013 9:52:01 AM
Creation date
3/5/2013 9:48:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/11/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,February 11, 2013 <br /> Page 24 <br /> Mr. Trudgeon opined that it should be a very interesting discussion, and may open <br /> a Pandora's box; however, he noted the more outreach the City could provide to <br /> inform people who to contact and where to obtain information, the better for eve- <br /> ryone in the long-run. <br /> Councilmember Etten spoke in support of any tools to help businesses function <br /> better in the community. <br /> Councilmember McGehee spoke in support of an annual sign permit option for <br /> businesses. Councilmember McGehee further supported the need to reasonably <br /> accommodate and differentiate Christmas tree sales as a seasonal option for per- <br /> manent businesses versus transient seasonal sales in a parking lot. Councilmem- <br /> ber McGehee spoke in support of metal roofs,but not siding. <br /> Councilmembers McGehee and Willmus asked staff to address the requirement <br /> that garage doors have a five foot(5') set back from the front door of the house. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon noted that such a variance was scheduled at the March Variance <br /> Board meeting; and provided the rationale for that setback requirement and design <br /> standard that garages not dominate a house, but that the front door or porch domi- <br /> nate it. Mr. Trudgeon noted that staff had had limited success in the education <br /> process regarding this requirement to-date. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that a house is a house, and further opined that <br /> 80% of them in the community have the garage forward of the house, and she <br /> didn't see anything offensive about it, but that it was simply a matter of taste. <br /> Councilmember McGehee concurred with the height restrictions for"silos." <br /> Mr. Paschke clarified that there were existing industrial silos in the community, so <br /> they couldn't be excluded, but the heights could be capped. <br /> Page 2, lines 62-24 <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Paschke reviewed the rationale <br /> in Community Business and Regional Business zoning districts for placement of <br /> certain amenities, including drive-thru's not allowed adjacent to public streets, <br /> with trash enclosures and dumpsters allowable. Mr. Paschke advised that staff <br /> was working with design issues and how they were located on properties when <br /> not just on one public street. While offering challenges, Mr. Paschke advised that <br /> an attempt was being made to re-craft language to allow for greater flexibility in <br /> meeting code requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.