My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013_0318_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2013
>
2013_0318_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2013 4:01:49 PM
Creation date
3/14/2013 3:48:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br /> <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING 1 <br />OF THE 2 <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE 3 <br /> 4 <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 5 <br /> 6 <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City 7 <br />of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on the 18 th day of March , 8 <br />20 13 , at 6:00 p.m. 9 <br /> 10 <br />The following members were present: 11 <br /> 12 <br /> and the following were absent: . 13 <br /> 14 <br />Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 15 <br /> 16 <br />RESOLUTION No. ________ 17 <br /> 18 <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REPURCHASE OF 180 -188 ELMER STREET 19 <br />WEST BY COTTONWOOD HOLDINGS, LLC FROM RAMSEY COUNTY 20 <br /> 21 <br />WHEREAS, 180, 182, 184,186, and188 Elmer Street West, Roseville, Minnesota was 22 <br />forfeited to the State of Minnesota and Ramsey County for failure to pay 23 <br />taxes on August 1, 2012; and 24 <br /> 25 <br />WHEREAS, Cottonwood Holdings, LLC, the previous owners of the property has filed 26 <br />an application with Ramsey County to repurchase the lots known as 180 -27 <br />188 Elmer Street West; and 28 <br /> 29 <br />WHEREAS, Ramsey County Board Po licy No. 99 -507 requires that each repurchase 30 <br />application be referred to the municipality in which the property is located 31 <br />for a recommendation on whether the repurchase application should be 32 <br />approved or denied.; and 33 <br /> 34 <br />WHEREAS, Policy 99 -507 requires that the municipality document whether the 35 <br />property is considered a municipal problem based on documented police, 36 <br />building code, illegal activity, or health violations in the past five years.; 37 <br />and 38 <br /> 39 <br />WHEREAS, the City of Roseville has reviewed their records and found no documented 40 <br />police calls, code enforcement issues, actions of illegal activity or health 41 <br />violations within the past five years. 42 <br /> 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.