Laserfiche WebLink
171 however, not all of them and /or their tenants were conscientious or interested in <br />172 voluntary or mandatory recycling efforts. At the request of Member Gjerdingen, <br />173 Mr. Pratt clarified that the annual report was a public document and provided <br />174 comparisons for collection points and types. <br />175 <br />176 <br />177 <br />178 <br />179 <br />180 <br />181 <br />182 <br />183 <br />184 <br />185 <br />186 <br />187 <br />188 <br />189 <br />190 <br />191 <br />192 <br />193 <br />194 <br />195 <br />196 <br />197 <br />198 <br />199 <br />200 <br />201 <br />202 <br />203 <br />Outreach/Education <br />204 <br />frequent education of residents should be emphasized more, such as "contractor <br />205 <br />shall mail quarterly to participants a summary of what and how much was <br />206 <br />recycling" in an effort to generate excitement and competitiveness by residents <br />207 <br />for the recycling program. <br />208 <br />209 <br />Chair Vanderwall noted the City's immigrant population who were unfamiliar <br />210 <br />with the culture, and therefore having the greatest learning curve in how to <br />211 <br />identify different areas for language- appropriate educational materials, especially <br />212 <br />in larger multi - family housing through letters, notices and also good, clear <br />213 <br />signage for their benefit <br />214 <br />215 <br />Mr. Pratt noted that it was easier to identify non - English speaking families in <br />216 <br />multi- family buildings, but more difficult in single - family residences. Mr. Pratt <br />Page 5 of 10 <br />