My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013_0325_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2013
>
2013_0325_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2013 4:00:22 PM
Creation date
3/21/2013 4:18:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />Paschke advised that most of the uses would be small in scale, within the 3,500 to 4,000 <br />square foot limitation; and would not accommodate uses for major production and/or <br />processing. <br />Public Comments <br />Mark Rancone, Roseville Properties <br />As a representative of several multi-tenant and single-tenant buildings in Roseville within <br />Regional Business District zoning designations, Mr. Rancone spoke in support of staff’s <br />recommendation for text amendments as outlined; and expressed appreciation for staff <br />being pro-active in understanding the realities of leasing to tenants under current limited <br />uses. <br />As an example, Mr. Rancone noted the CPI Card Group, formerly UV Color, a tenant of <br />Roseville Properties using that entire building that had been modestly upgraded several <br />years ago. Other examples included two other Roseville Properties buildings located at <br />1975 and 1995 County Road B-2 across from the U.S. Post Office (e.g. <br />Schneidermann’s) that had been constructed in the mid-1970’s, and formerly <br />office/warehouse uses. Mr. Rancone noted that the use had now been converted by <br />Roseville Properties to retail formats, with HOM Furniture built on the rear of that property <br />and having frontage road and freeway access and/or visibility versus their properties <br />running east/west to the freeway and having limited exposure that provided limited <br />opportunities for those parcels. <br />Mr. Rancone advised that the objective of their firm was that the buildings be allowed <br />uses for their highest and best uses. Mr. Rancone advised that Roseville Properties was <br />considering upgrading their two (2) buildings, including rain gardens and parking lot <br />improvements for better storm water control, as well as façade rehabilitation to entice <br />future tenants, some of whom requested the ability to have light manufacturing uses. <br />Before committing to making significant investments on those upgrades for those <br />buildings, Mr. Rancone asked that the Planning Commission support staff’s <br />recommendations and approve the requests. <br />Mr. Rancone advised that the buildings themselves had structural obsolescence that <br />would prevent any use for heavy semi traffic; but this action would allow for more <br />flexibility in City Code for practical application and uses over the next twenty (20) years. <br />Mr. Rancone opined that they are not currently good sites for high retail uses in their <br />present locations/conditions. <br />Vice Chair Gisselquist closed the Public Hearing for File 0017 at approximately 7:00 p.m.; <br />with no one appearing for or against. <br />MOTION <br />Member Gisselquist moved, seconded by Member Strohmeier to recommend to the <br />City Council APPROVAL of the text amendment adding Limited <br />Production/Processing into the Permitted Uses Table 1005.01 and specifically for <br />the Regional Business District, as detailed in the staff report dated October 3, <br />2012. <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />Staff advised that anticipated City Council action is anticipated for October 22, 2012. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.