Laserfiche WebLink
City of <br /> S��IILLL <br /> Minnesota,USA <br /> Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Minutes <br /> City Hall Council Chambers, 2660 Civic Center Drive <br /> Monday, February 25, 2013 <br /> State of the City Address by Mayor Roe at 5:00 p.m. <br /> 1. Roll Call <br /> Mayor Roe called to order the Roseville City Council regular meeting at approximately <br /> 5:30 p.m. and welcomed everyone. Voting and Seating Order: Laliberte; McGehee; <br /> Willmus; Etten; and Roe. City Attorney Mark Gaughan was also present. <br /> Closed Session at 5:30 p.m. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that State Statutes Section 13d.05 permits city council meetings to be closed in <br /> order to discuss certain matters relating to prospective land purchases or sales, and that the City <br /> was considering a potential acquisition of land located at 934 Woodhill Drive in Roseville, Min- <br /> nesota. <br /> Willmus moved, McGehee seconded,to move to Closed Executive Session. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Laliberte; McGehee; Willmus; Etten; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> Mayor Roe convened the city council in closed executive session at approximately 5:35 p.m. for <br /> the purpose of discussing a potential acquisition of land located at 934 Woodhill Drive in Rose- <br /> ville, Minnesota. In addition to the city council members, others present included City Manager <br /> Malinen, Parks & Recreation Director Lonnie Brokke, Community Development Director Pat <br /> Trudgeon, and City Attorney Mark Gaughan. <br /> Mayor Roe adjourned the closed executive session at approximately 6:05 p.m. <br /> Mayor Roe reconvened the city council in open session at approximately 6:13 p.m. <br /> 2. Approve Agenda <br /> Councilmember Willmus requested removal of Item 13.e entitled, "Continue Discussion <br /> on Resident Survey. At the request of Councilmember McGehee questioning this re- <br /> quest, Councilmember Willmus stated that he felt this item should be put out for rebid <br /> prior to moving forward if it came up for discussion by the City Council at a later date. <br /> Councilmember Willmus also opined that, as far as the budget process, even moving <br /> forward,he was unsure of a resident survey being required at this point for that process. <br />