My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0225
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0225
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2013 12:46:50 PM
Creation date
3/29/2013 12:40:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/25/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,February 25,2013 <br /> Page 10 <br /> Councilmember Willmus asked that his questions be addressed to Community <br /> Development Director Patrick Trudgeon, with Mayor Roe recognizing Mr. <br /> Trudgeon. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Trudgeon noted that Roseville <br /> had approximately 15,000 households, and from a code enforcement perspective, <br /> staff dealt with approximately one dozen outside storage of appliance complaints <br /> annually out of 400-500 code enforcement complaints. <br /> Councilmember Willmus referenced comments in the staff report that alluded that <br /> a result of this pilot program could be a future implementation of a full-fledged <br /> program and additional $10 fee annually per household. <br /> City Manager Malinen clarified that this was not the intent, and those comments <br /> were specifically related to how one community was currently addressing their <br /> problem, and was not intended as a staff recommendation for the City of Rose- <br /> ville to follow. <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted that, if such a program were implemented, it <br /> would cost$150,000 annually for residents. <br /> Mayor Roe noted, if such a program were ever implemented, the $10 per house- <br /> hold fee was charged by another community, but a per resident fee in Roseville <br /> could be different. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that there was currently ample opportunity for <br /> appliance recycling through trash haulers, who were legally prohibited from de- <br /> positing those appliances at landfills and requiring that they be recycled. Coun- <br /> cilmember Willmus further opined that this seemed to be a redundant service and <br /> appeared to be sufficiently handled in the private sector. <br /> Willmus moved, McGehee seconded, not to authorize acceptance of Ramsey <br /> County Public Entity Innovation Grant funds, nor approval of any agreement be- <br /> tween Ramsey County and the City of Roseville (Attachment A) for an appliance <br /> recycling pilot program; nor approval of any proposed contract with Better Fu- <br /> tures Enterprise (Attachment B) for those services. <br /> Councilmember McGehee concurred with Councilmember Willmus that this pro- <br /> gram was not necessary; and as a Ramsey County taxpayer, opined tha t it was a <br /> waste of county tax monies as well. Councilmember McGehee further opined <br /> that there was no need for staff to expend forty (40) hours of their time or equip- <br /> ment use; and if items were stored outside in people's yards, they would eventual- <br /> ly be caught by code enforcement inspections, and eventually need to be disposed <br /> of properly or the City would do so for them. However, Councilmember McGe- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.