My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2013_0311
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2013
>
CC_Minutes_2013_0311
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2013 12:53:54 PM
Creation date
3/29/2013 12:53:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/11/2013
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,March 11,2013 <br /> Page 8 <br /> cide at some point to move that area as another outrigger of Rosedale, then all <br /> those properties with Light Industrial Conditional Uses would be able to retain <br /> that classification. Councilmember McGehee expressed her hope that staff could <br /> come up with another option, without limiting people's options, but avoiding a <br /> Conditional Use that may not preclude another business that could prove less de- <br /> sirable for the City. <br /> Mr. Paschke cautioned that the City's Zoning Codes must be transparent across <br /> the board, and not specific to a particular business owner. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon noted that an Interim Permit was too short in term with business <br /> owners hesitant to make significant improvements based on that short term, and a <br /> Conditional Use too long term and opening the door for a less desirable business- <br /> es allowed. However, Mr. Trudgeon advised that staff would give the issue more <br /> thought for other options. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte expressed appreciation to staff and the Planning Com- <br /> mission for the amount of work they'd already invested in this issue. Being new <br /> to the City Council, Councilmember Laliberte advised that she had reviewed pre- <br /> vious conversations, and was comforted to know that no Regional Business Dis- <br /> tricts were adjacent to residential neighborhoods. However, Councilmember <br /> Laliberte expressed concern that, with light production, more truck traffic would <br /> be evident, and questioned how that would be addressed. <br /> Mr. Paschke advised that, typically with light industrial uses, there was not a sig- <br /> nificant amount of truck traffic, and that was usually less than retail uses. How- <br /> ever, Mr. Paschke advised that staff would review that concern as well. <br /> Acting Mayor Etten noted that a business would currently be operating already, <br /> and there would typically not be an increase in truck traffic now or in the foresee- <br /> able future. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte offered her recognition in the need for consistency and <br /> getting language to be in concert with the rest of the plans. <br /> Councilmember McGehee suggested expanding the definition to include some- <br /> thing about truck traffic. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte noted that this definition already existed; and saw no <br /> rationale in changing the definition for that specific area only. <br /> Mr. Paschke concurred, noting that the only intended amendment was in changing <br /> the table for limited production and processing to be a permitted use. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.