My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-04-02_PR_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2013
>
2013-04-02_PR_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2014 8:47:37 AM
Creation date
4/1/2013 11:01:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Villa Park <br />Implementation Planning Session One <br />26 February 2013 <br />Page 5 <br />outside. <br />Special features <br />No ideas offered <br />Park programs <br />No ideas offered <br />Other <br />Park signage on Dale—nobody know this end of the park including all its <br />possibilities; bocce! so exciting; the response included a drawings suggesting <br />signage at entrance from Dale indicating park name and activities (bocce, baseball, <br />etc.). <br />Safe trail access to/from Dale—add a bike/walk crossing to access Dale Trail and <br />Villa through parking lot; possibly like crossing at Rice and McCarron's beach; the <br />response included a drawing suggesting two access points from Dale with crossing! <br />to the trail on the opposite side of the street, with one crossing occurring at the B - <br />Dale Club entry and the other location on the opposite side of the B -Dale Club. <br />General park improvements <br />No ideas offered <br />Building and shelter <br />No ideas offered <br />Special features <br />No ideas offered <br />Park programs <br />No ideas offered <br />Other <br />Needs to be wild—collaborate with Nature Center; identify plants; sign at B -Dale <br />identifying Roseville park; make shelter minimalist, no money to staff. <br />After sharing ideas and recording them on lists, individuals were asked to indicate their <br />priorities among ideas for the site, building, exhibits, programs, and other ideas by placing a <br />3 next to their highest priority, a 2 for their second highest priority, and a 1 for their third <br />highest priority. They were also asked to place a star next to their overall favorite ideas. <br />Responses were as follows: <br />General park improvements <br />8 0 More trash cans and dog waste containers <br />19 1 Trails—on neighborhood focus <br />5 0 Lights on paved trails <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.