Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> Date: 04/08/13 <br /> Item No.: 13.a <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br />Item Description: Receive City Staff Budget Program Priorities <br />B <br />ACKGROUND <br />1 <br />At the March 25, 2013 City Council meeting, the Council discussed the budget program prioritization <br />2 <br />process including the methodology to be used to assign budget priorities. It included the following <br />3 <br />ranking criteria: <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />Priority <br />RankCriteria <br />Critical <br />7 impact on meeting City Goals and Community Aspirations <br />Significant <br />5 impact on meeting City Goals and Community Aspirations <br />Important <br />3 impact on meeting City Goals and Community Aspirations <br />Desirable <br />1 impact on meeting City Goals and Community Aspirations <br />7 <br />8 <br />During the meeting it was noted that many of the functions the City performs were not specifically <br />9 <br />identified in either city goals or community aspirations, but are necessary to continue normal city <br />10 <br />operations. They typically include functions that are required under federal or state law, or City Code. <br />11 <br />The Council directed Staff to use the same priority-ranking system noted above with the understanding <br />12 <br />that these functions aren’t necessary designed to achieve specific goals or aspirations. <br />13 <br />14 <br />The Council then directed Staff to develop and submit budget program rankings for their specific <br />15 <br />department only, in an effort to guide the Council’s own prioritization process. A copy of Staff’s <br />16 <br />budget program priority rankings is included in Attachment A. <br />17 <br />18 <br />O <br />P <br />OLICYBJECTIVE <br />19 <br />A review of the Council’s Program Budget Priorities is consistent with the adopted budget calendar and <br />20 <br />the City’s Performance Management Program. <br />21 <br />FI <br />INANCIAL MPACTS <br />22 <br />Not applicable. <br />23 <br />SR <br />TAFF ECOMMENDATION <br />24 <br />Staff recommends that the Council continue to support the City’s Performance Management <br />25 <br />Program by conducting a budget program prioritization process to be used for the 2014/2015 Budget. <br />26 <br />Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br />