Laserfiche WebLink
tm <br />356 <br />Member DeBenedet opined that the more evaluation categories they were, the <br />357 <br />more muddled evaluation because, making it necessary to determine the initial <br />358 <br />RFP submission and determining compliance, and whether or not the goals were <br />359 <br />achieved or that the City got the results they expected. Member DeBenedet asked <br />360 <br />if there were items that could be included in the RFP as mandatory, or not in the <br />361 <br />selection process, but simply a given. <br />362 <br />363 Chair Vanderwall cautioned that if things were not included, the City may not get <br />364 what it wants, and that by including them it emphasized their importance. Chair <br />365 Vanderwall noted the need to ensure that Roseville participation remained high or <br />366 increased and didn't diminish as some communities experienced. Chair <br />367 Vanderwall, regarding "electronic communication," noted that this could also <br />368 include the PWETC's desire to encourage information delivered by a means other <br />369 <br />370 <br />371 <br />372 <br />373 <br />374 <br />375 <br />376 <br />377 <br />378 <br />379 <br />380 <br />381 <br />than paper. <br />Member Felice suggested i <br />tions" with <br />"effective education of residents," wh provi the City with information <br />for the website or other it s. <br />Member Gjerdingen opined that "electronic communications" was part of <br />"residential education" from his perspective. <br />Chair Vanderwall opined that he was not yet ready to eliminate "electronic <br />communications" as a separate item, as he valued reduced paper coming into <br />homes, and that it wasn't simply about education. Chair Vanderwall noted other <br />options for communication to educate residents on something negative that may <br />Page 9 of 14 <br />